Re: Problem w/ Forwarding Zone in Caching-Only Config

2017-06-27 Thread Mark Andrews
There should be NO need for this if you setup service discovery properly for the network. If done properly you go from IP address and netmask to a delegated forward domain which accepts update requests from the devices on the network. Unfortunately the Presto documentation sucks when it comes

Re: Problem w/ Forwarding Zone in Caching-Only Config

2017-06-27 Thread btb via bind-users
On 6/27/17 12:13 PM, Michael W. Fleming wrote: We're setting up a wireless printing service that uses Zeroconf/bonjour/rendevouz dns entries. The product, Presto, has it's own dns server for a private, on-campus only zone (presto.). We're running bind 9.9 with a master server, three slaves and

RE: Problem w/ Forwarding Zone in Caching-Only Config

2017-06-27 Thread Darcy Kevin (FCA)
You have a trailing dot in the zone definition. It makes a difference. Personally, I wouldn't use forwarding at all, and I'd build this for scalability. Define a master zone for, say, 168.136.dnssd.presto, and then delegate from that to whatever address ranges you deploy Presto to in the

Problem w/ Forwarding Zone in Caching-Only Config

2017-06-27 Thread Michael W. Fleming
We're setting up a wireless printing service that uses Zeroconf/bonjour/rendevouz dns entries. The product, Presto, has it's own dns server for a private, on-campus only zone (presto.). We're running bind 9.9 with a master server, three slaves and two caching-only servers (anycasted to