On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 04:06 Alberto Colosi wrote:
> as just said inside previous mail
>
> ever if you edit some , you should understand
>
Thanks for your help and good links, Alberto.
-Tom
___
Please visit
Hi Grant,
Thanx for the reply. My intention is not academic but some business case.
Let me try to describe it. I have some network appliance sitting on a
remote end and using satellite for internet connectivity. The traffic
accounting on the wan is already implemented and dns that is consumed
On 23/07/2017 15:16, Mick Lee wrote:
I have a colleague who has said he has a parts of a PCAP to BIND query
log agent that runs on UNIX platforms, and he is happy to port that to
Windows for me - he's actually working on it now (for a few beers :) ).
dnscap basically does the same thing. No
Hi Matus,
You have a point and seems that i will do this at the end. I was just
wondering if there is another approach from the technical standpoint.
Currently I am not accounting DNS at all. It is provided for free. I am
accounting all other traffic though (http, etc). Since every byte is
On 22.07.17 21:51, Abi Askushi wrote:
I was wondering if bind9 can support TPROXY. This would facilate my
accounting as then all WAN traffic would have the client IP as the source
IP. ( I have a similar configuration with squid where I was able to
account
the WAN traffic using this trick without
Thanks Phil,
You are right it's not a BIND issue :)
I am a BIND user myself, and I was wondering how other BIND users have
copied when they've had to deal with Windows DNS servers like this.
I appreciate any response to be honest.
I have a colleague who has said he has a parts of a PCAP to
On 22/07/2017 07:33, Mick Lee wrote:
Hi Guys,
Can anyone offer any advice based on their experience?
Well, if I understand correctly, your main problem is the windows boxes
running windows DNS, so this is not a bind problem. You might be better
asking elsewhere.
However, honestly I would
Because i would like to avoid counting traffic for cached responses. But
this is an option also if all other are not easy.
On Jul 23, 2017 16:19, "Matus UHLAR - fantomas" wrote:
> On 22.07.17 21:51, Abi Askushi wrote:
>
>> I was wondering if bind9 can support TPROXY. This
On 22.07.17 21:51, Abi Askushi wrote:
I was wondering if bind9 can support TPROXY. This would facilate my
accounting as then all WAN traffic would have the client IP as the source
IP. ( I have a similar configuration with squid where I was able to account
the WAN traffic using this trick without
9 matches
Mail list logo