Re: load balancing

On 09/18/2018 04:12 PM, SIMON BABY wrote: Are we support this with our current release? BIND has supported round robin DNS for a long time. -- Grant. . . . unix || die smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ Please visit

Re: load balancing

Thanks Warren. Are we support this with our current release? Rgds Simon On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 3:04 PM Leroy Tennison wrote: > Before selecting round robin consider the drawbacks - a DNS server being > down, DNS server inconsistency, an application expecting some kind of > stateful

Re: load balancing

Before selecting round robin consider the drawbacks - a DNS server being down, DNS server inconsistency, an application expecting some kind of stateful interaction.  Finding root cause with DNS round robin can be challenging.  I'm not saying don't use it, your situation may be able to

Re: load balancing

Thanks Warren. I am looking DNS RR distribution. (DNS Round Robin Load distribution). Round robin DNS is often used to load balance requests between a number of Web servers . For example, a company has one domain name and three identical copies of the

Re: load balancing

On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 4:01 PM SIMON BABY wrote: > Hi, > > Are we support load balancing with latest DNSSEC ? I have a DNSSEC > application with unbound library. Do i have to add any extra configuration > to support Load Balancing? > Your question is sufficiently light on detail that it cannot

load balancing

Hi, Are we support load balancing with latest DNSSEC ? I have a DNSSEC application with unbound library. Do i have to add any extra configuration to support Load Balancing? Rgds Simon ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: PRNG not seeded, service won't start

I found that link previously and tried it. It didn't complain about that not being a valid setting, but it didn't change the outcome. I'm beginning to believe I may just have to upgrade to CentOS 7. It needs to be done at some point anyway, I just didn't want to do it now. -Christopher On

Re: PRNG not seeded, service won't start

Those are both good. Recent versions of bind are now using OpenSSL for random number generation and not /dev/random or /dev/urandom. Since the old version still works the /dev devices are obviously working. -Christopher On Tue, 2018-09-18 at 07:52 +, Alberto Colosi wrote: ON INTERNET IS

Re: PRNG not seeded, service won't start

I've tried this one. It doesn't work. There is plenty of entropy on the box, but it still won't start with the same error. -Christopher On Tue, 2018-09-18 at 01:22 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Haveged Am 18.09.18 um 01:11 schrieb Howard, Christopher: I'm

Re: PRNG not seeded, service won't start

Howard, Christopher wrote: > Does any one have any ideas of what I'm missing or what I can do to > resolve this (besides upgrading this box to CentOS 7)? Try setting `random-device "/dev/urandom";` in `named.conf`. See

Re: PRNG not seeded, service won't start

ON INTERNET IS LIKE TO BE LINKED TO RANDOM SEED GENERATION check # ls -l /dev/random /dev/urandom crw-r--r-- 1 root system 39, 0 Jan 22 10:48 /dev/random crw-r--r-- 1 root system 39, 1 Jan 22 10:48 /dev/urandom From: bind-users on behalf of Howard,

Re: ISC Bind stops answering queries

Hi, Updated to the latest stable and it seems to have resolved t heissue. Thanks ian.. From: bind-users on behalf of Dave Warren Sent: 17 September 2018 19:01 To: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: ISC Bind stops answering queries On Mon, Sep 17,

Re: PRNG not seeded, service won't start

are your compiler and libs updated ? From: bind-users on behalf of Howard, Christopher Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2018 1:11 AM To: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: PRNG not seeded, service won't start I'm attempting to upgrade from bind 9.10.4-P8 to