Re: Batch updating all DNS records on my Bind server

2020-04-20 Thread LuKreme
On Apr 20, 2020, at 18:11, Mark Andrews wrote: > > Really all machines should be updating their own address records in the > DNS. Have each machine create a KEY record with its name. Install the > KEY record in the DNS. Use SIG(0) signed UPDATE requests to update the > address records. This

Re: Batch updating all DNS records on my Bind server

2020-04-20 Thread Mark Andrews
Really all machines should be updating their own address records in the DNS. Have each machine create a KEY record with its name. Install the KEY record in the DNS. Use SIG(0) signed UPDATE requests to update the address records. update-policy { grant * self . A KEY; // Allow the

Re: BIND-9.16.1 memory leak?

2020-04-20 Thread Michael Sinatra
On 2020-04-17 06:45, sth...@nethelp.no wrote: > We have what appears to be a significant memory leak in BIND-9.16.1. > > Environment: > FreeBSD 12.1-STABLE. > BIND-9.16.1 installed from packages. > Also uses libuv-1.35.0 installed from packages. > Authoritative only. > Around 800 zones of

Re: Batch updating all DNS records on my Bind server

2020-04-20 Thread Chuck Aurora
On 2020-04-20 10:33, Warren Kumari wrote: On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 12:52 PM Tony Finch wrote: @lbutlr wrote: > > Is it possible to batch update all the domains? Looking at nsupdate it > looks like I have to step through and do every domain individually. An UPDATE request can change many

Re: Batch updating all DNS records on my Bind server

2020-04-20 Thread Warren Kumari
On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 12:52 PM Tony Finch wrote: > > @lbutlr wrote: > > > > Is it possible to batch update all the domains? Looking at nsupdate it > > looks like I have to step through and do every domain individually. > > An UPDATE request can change many records, so long as they are all in

Re: oddity with trubuiltpambula.com.au

2020-04-20 Thread Karl Auer
On Mon, 2020-04-20 at 13:06 +1000, Mark Andrews wrote: > Note there isn’t a “additional lookup occurring” because what you are > seeing is a referral and a answer. Yes, I realised that after sending my email. r.au returned the webcity nameservers, and one of those returned the NS details

Re: BIND-9.16.1 memory leak?

2020-04-20 Thread Evan Hunt
On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 02:55:53PM +0200, sth...@nethelp.no wrote: > I now have a pcap file of queries that I can replay with the "drool" > application, and I'm consistently seeing similar memory leak problems > (i.e. the problems are reproducible). The memory leak rate seems to be > very