Re: A good name for development branch releases package

2021-12-01 Thread Ondřej Surý
I like bind-next too - shame we didn’t think of it when we created the repositories. Ondrej -- Ondřej Surý (He/Him) ond...@isc.org > On 1. 12. 2021, at 17:56, Petr Menšík wrote: > > Well, why not, I like that. Only slight disadvantage to bind9-dev is it > is never called similar way by ISC in

Re: A good name for development branch releases package

2021-12-01 Thread Petr Menšík
Well, why not, I like that. Only slight disadvantage to bind9-dev is it is never called similar way by ISC in any document. It is short, understandable, without conflicts. Describes well purpose and difference of that release also. Thank you for this suggestion, an excellent candidate! On

Re: A good name for development branch releases package

2021-12-01 Thread Petr Špaček
If you don't like nginx naming, then what about Linux kernel naming: bind-next (similarly linux-next)? Petr Špaček On 01. 12. 21 13:07, pemensik at redhat.com (Petr Menšík) wrote: Mainline seems strange term to me. I think it should be used also by ISC to identify that major version. When I

Re: A good name for development branch releases package

2021-12-01 Thread Ron Hall
sorry for the noise that would have been bind9-dev Ron Hall Senior System Administrator IT Services - NCS Core Infrastructure & Applications 514 398 3718 From: bind-users on behalf of Petr Menšík Sent: Wednesday, December 1, 2021 8:43:55 AM To: Ondřej Surý Cc:

Re: A good name for development branch releases package

2021-12-01 Thread Ron Hall via bind-users
bind9- if were voting Ron Hall Senior System Administrator IT Services - NCS Core Infrastructure & Applications 514 398 3718 From: bind-users on behalf of Petr Menšík Sent: Wednesday, December 1, 2021 8:43:55 AM To: Ondřej Surý Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org

Re: A good name for development branch releases package

2021-12-01 Thread Petr Menšík
On 12/1/21 14:00, Ondřej Surý wrote: > What if you call it bind9-git or bind9-snapshot? The monthly releases are > development snapshots anyway... That would look like our custom tarballs made from main branch commits. I don't want to do arbitrary releases directly from git. Release notes

Re: A good name for development branch releases package

2021-12-01 Thread Ondřej Surý
What if you call it bind9-git or bind9-snapshot? The monthly releases are development snapshots anyway... Ondrej -- Ondřej Surý (He/Him) ond...@isc.org > On 1. 12. 2021, at 13:07, Petr Menšík wrote: > > Mainline seems strange term to me. I think it should be used also by ISC > to identify

Re: A good name for development branch releases package

2021-12-01 Thread G.W. Haywood via bind-users
Hi there, On Wed, 1 Dec 2021, Petr Men??k wrote: ... Would you have some idea, how should it be called? Call a spade a spade. Or in this case "bind9-unstable". Do you like "bind9-dev" base name? No. It will cause confusion. -- 73, Ged. ___

Re: A good name for development branch releases package

2021-12-01 Thread Petr Menšík
Mainline seems strange term to me. I think it should be used also by ISC to identify that major version. When I download an archive, it uses Development status. Is mainline word ever used in any documentation for BIND9? I have never seen that in any article. I would like to use something users can