On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 3:29 PM Mirsad Goran Todorovac <
mirsad.todoro...@alu.unizg.hr> wrote:
> Hi Crist,
>
> 1. Actually, I am running dynamic updates with BIND9 and ISC DHCP server
> for about a half a year and I am frankly very happy with the way it works.
> This is at the Academy. So, I am
Hi Crist,
1. Actually, I am running dynamic updates with BIND9 and ISC DHCP server
for about a half a year and I am frankly very happy with the way it
works. This is at the Academy. So, I am familiar with the dynamic (DDNS)
updates. Though there had been some tricky stuff with sub-/24 reverse
Nick,
On 27-05-2022 10:27, Nick Tait via bind-users wrote:
On 26/05/22 20:34, Matthijs Mekking wrote:
What version are you using? We had a bug with dnssec-policy and views
(#2463), but that has been fixed.
Since 9.16.18 you should not be able to set the same key-directory for
the same zone
Hi,
Sorry for not replying earlier (traveling).
Yes, I would recommend key separation (that is use a different
key-directory per view).
I am going to investigate your configuration more next week, to see if
there is a hidden bug.
Best regards,
Matthijs
On 26-05-2022 14:33, Sandro
On 26/05/22 20:34, Matthijs Mekking wrote:
What version are you using? We had a bug with dnssec-policy and views
(#2463), but that has been fixed.
Since 9.16.18 you should not be able to set the same key-directory for
the same zone in different views.
Hi Matthijs.
You got me worried just
Hi,
I just stumbled upon a problem. It happened on FreeBSD 13.1-RC (going to update
to 13.1 today).
I am running bind 9.18.3 with dnstap using a Unix socket.
Once the socket has been opened by bind, if the process serving the Unix socket
blocks and you try to
kill named, it fails to stop,
6 matches
Mail list logo
