Re: Intermittent v9.18 build fails on Fedora COPR buildsys, always in `netmgr_test` ?

2022-08-29 Thread Ondřej Surý
Then run only the system tests by running make check only in the bin/tests/system directory instead of the top level. Or don’t run the tests at all - these are mostly meant for development purposes where we have better control over the build environment. Ondřej -- Ondřej Surý — ISC (He/Him)

Re: Intermittent v9.18 build fails on Fedora COPR buildsys, always in `netmgr_test` ?

2022-08-29 Thread PGNet Dev
You might want to set the CI=true environment variable to reduce the set of the netmgr unit tests to just the more reliable subset. thx, trying that now @ COPR with export CI=true in .spec @ https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/pgfed/rpms/bind/blob/rawhide/f/bind.spec#_357

Re: Intermittent v9.18 build fails on Fedora COPR buildsys, always in `netmgr_test` ?

2022-08-29 Thread PGNet Dev
The netmgr unit tests are not meant to run fully in the CI as some of it are time sensitive. You might want to set the CI=true environment variable to reduce the set of the netmgr unit tests to just the more reliable subset. thx, trying that now @ COPR in the case that it does the trick,

Re: Intermittent v9.18 build fails on Fedora COPR buildsys, always in `netmgr_test` ?

2022-08-29 Thread Ondřej Surý
The netmgr unit tests are not meant to run fully in the CI as some of it are time sensitive. You might want to set the CI=true environment variable to reduce the set of the netmgr unit tests to just the more reliable subset. Ondrej -- Ondřej Surý — ISC (He/Him) My working hours and your

Intermittent v9.18 build fails on Fedora COPR buildsys, always in `netmgr_test` ?

2022-08-29 Thread PGNet Dev
I'm building bind9 (v9.18.5, atm) on Fedora's COPR infrastructure. Building for Fedora 36, 37 & Rawhide, the builds FAIL randomly/intermittently here For example, with no changes to any source/spec, simply triggering rebuilds, over a period of just a few hours, Time F36

RE: Move from Development to Production

2022-08-29 Thread David C. Templeton
Thanks, Bruce, but no luck. There aren’t any builds for Rocky Linux 9 yet. Regards, Dave From: David C. Templeton Sent: Monday, August 29, 2022 7:53 AM To: Bruce Johnson Cc: Ondřej Surý ; bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: RE: Move from Development to Production Thanks, Bruce. I’ll try it out.

RE: Move from Development to Production

2022-08-29 Thread David C. Templeton
Thanks, Bruce. I’ll try it out. Regards, Dave From: Bruce Johnson Sent: Friday, August 26, 2022 4:28 PM To: David C. Templeton Cc: Ondřej Surý ; bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: Move from Development to Production CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not

Re: Mailing list questions (DMARC, ARC, more?)

2022-08-29 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 25.08.22 18:10, Alessandro Vesely wrote: Thanks Ged for all the feedback. The lack of interest by others proves that From: munging is not so much of a nuisance as they say... This will come sooner or later, however: earlier this year I've done small dmarc research for our client: -

Re: Question about additional section in BIND-responses

2022-08-29 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 05:28:19PM +0200, Tom wrote: Using BIND-9.18.5 as a recursive server: What's the reason, that BIND answers with the additional section for the the following query where for example Knot resolver and also PowerDNS resolver doesn't add the additional section for the same

Re: Move from Development to Production

2022-08-29 Thread Michal Nowak
On 26/08/2022 23:57, Benny Pedersen wrote: David C. Templeton skrev den 2022-08-26 21:50: Sorry for any confusion. I started with 9.18.4 because I also wanted to test out upgrading. Install 9.18.4 first then make sure I could upgrade to 9.18.6 without issue. Am I following the correct link