Re: Deprecation notice for BIND 9: "resolver-nonbackoff-tries", "resolver-retry-interval"

On 07. 12. 23 22:12, Fred Morris wrote: I welcome birds of a feather. Need to define / refine the problem statement first. On 12/7/23 12:30 AM, Petr Špaček wrote: On 07. 12. 23 1:05, Fred Morris wrote: On Wed, 6 Dec 2023, Evan Hunt wrote: I say go ahead, if nothing else consider it a "scream

Re: Deprecation notice for BIND 9: "resolver-nonbackoff-tries", "resolver-retry-interval"

I welcome birds of a feather. Need to define / refine the problem statement first. On 12/7/23 12:30 AM, Petr Špaček wrote: > On 07. 12. 23 1:05, Fred Morris wrote: >> On Wed, 6 Dec 2023, Evan Hunt wrote: >> I say go ahead, if nothing else consider it a "scream test". But can >> you take a moment

RE: dnssec-delegation seems to be broken from .gov to bls.gov

Point taken and understood. But you know how it is when there is major outage the push from upper management is always for "fix it now" and get us up and running do your RCA later. Thanks Sandeep -Original Message- From: Mark Andrews Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2023 10:19 PM To:

Re: Deprecation notice for BIND 9: "resolver-nonbackoff-tries", "resolver-retry-interval"

On 07. 12. 23 1:05, Fred Morris wrote: On Wed, 6 Dec 2023, Evan Hunt wrote: I say go ahead, if nothing else consider it a "scream test". But can you take a moment and tell us which stakeholder group(s) you think you're optimizing for, why, and how? On the technical level we optimize using