-Original Message-
From: Mark Andrews [mailto:ma...@isc.org]
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 5:24 PM
To: Brad Bendily
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: sporatic, noaa.gov SERVFAIL
In message f5fc122448e1ba4a8d6d2119430b41d54724c...@mailmb06.swe.la.gov, Brad
Bendily writes:
Doesn't
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;www.nhc.noaa.gov. IN A
;; Query time: 320 msec
;; SERVER: 10.120.11.107#53(10.120.11.107) ;; WHEN: Thu Jan 29 11:53:59 CST
2015 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 45
bb
Brad Bendily
System Administrator
Northrop Grumman Corporation
Louisiana Dept. of
Children and Family
:12:45 CST 2015
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 483
;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
-Original Message-
From: Mark Andrews [mailto:ma...@isc.org]
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 3:38 PM
To: Brad Bendily
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: sporatic, noaa.gov SERVFAIL
Ensure
Based on your config below.
You're allowing 192.168.0.0/24 in your acl, but your actual network is
192.168.1.0/24.
Not sure if that was a typo, but change it if not.
bb
From: bind-users-bounces+brad.bendily=la@lists.isc.org
Hi Ray,
Did you ever get a resolution on this?
We have had intermittent trouble getting to:
www.nws.noaa.gov sites and the fix has been a full restart
of the named service. I wasn't really sure how or where to
start troubleshooting but when I saw this email I was hopeful
there would be a fix.
As
-
From: nex6 [mailto:b...@borg1911.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 10:43 AM
To: Brad Bendily
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: Reverse zones best practices
* Brad Bendily brad.bend...@la.gov [2012-06-25 16:35:28 -0500]:
wouldn't it be more confusing, in a big IP space with servers
I don't know about best practice in this case, but I decided to put our reverse
entries into one super netting file as you call it.
We had the same problem that a lot of reverse entries were missing, so I wrote
a script to parse the forward file and create the reverse. Then I incorporated
that
I would like to setup latest BIND/named [slaves] within
VMware environment - is there any implications I should be aware of?
Since I saw some issues running NTPd on VMware - thinking may
be 'named' might have similar issues...
None for me. I have been running my secondary on VMWare for
On 9/28/11 5:32 AM, Steve Arntzen i...@arntzen.us wrote:
Is your firewall Cisco based?
Yes. The firewall is Cisco based.
However, the main problem there is, there are several firewalls before
leaving our network and my dept doesn't manage all of them.
There is a known default setting in
When trying the DNSSEC check command from:
https://www.dns-oarc.net/oarc/services/replysizetest
behind our corporate firewall, I get:
rst.x476.rs.dns-oarc.net.
rst.x485.x476.rs.dns-oarc.net.
rst.x490.x485.x476.rs.dns-oarc.net.
Tested at 2011-09-27 20:32:34 UTC
205.172.49.177 sent EDNS buffer
Maybe some of the links mentioned here will help you...
https://www.dnssec-deployment.org/index.php/deployment-case-studies/dnssec-why-threats/
bb
-Original Message-
From: bind-users-bounces+brad.bendily=la@lists.isc.org
I am glad to be able to answer an email on this list.
I literally did this same thing 4 days ago and had the exact same
problem.
Here is the answer you seek:
https://www.isc.org/faq/item/182
bb
-Original Message-
From: bind-users-bounces+brad.bendily=la@lists.isc.org
12 matches
Mail list logo
