system fail
on that one lookups but (presumably) succeeds on others?
--
Gordon A. Lang
--
From: "John E.P. Hynes"
Sent: Saturday, August 24, 2013 8:55 AM
To: "Barry Margolin"
Cc: ;
Subject: Re: Strange problem with a query delet
.
And, by the way, we have NEVER needed to change masters
since mid-2005 when it was first deployed. I am anxiously
waiting for an actual failure to justify all my work.!!!
--
Gordon A. Lang
----- Original Message -
From: "Gordon A. Lang"
To:
Cc: "Mike Mitchell"
Sent:
ems
extremely insane.
Ah. There, I feel much better now having said that.
--
Gordon A. Lang / 313-819-7978
- Original Message -
From: Mike Mitchell
To: fddi
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 10:52 AM
Subject: RE: multi-master with mysql backend
I'd keep two
by Microsoft that perhaps I've never heard of -- anyone
know?
Does anyone have any other interesting information about BIND 10 with respect
to multi-master dynamic zone functionality?
Thanks.
--
Gordon A. Lang / 313-819-7978___
bind
a very critical role of telling
all clients where to send dynamic DNS updates.
I hear that support for multi-master with dynamic zones is expected in
version 10. I have my own questions about how that will be done.
--
Gordon A. Lang / 313-819-7978
- Original Message -
From: &q
of having the architecture succeed in our
environment.
--
Gordon A. Lang
- Original Message -
From: "Martin McCormick"
To:
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 7:32 AM
Subject: DNS Redundancy
The normal procedure on internet-connected systems is to
set the resolv.conf file
) have its own TTL.
--
Gordon A. Lang
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
The slave files do not carry the "@" I presume you are using on
the master -- the zone-transfer data includes the specific domain
names -- so the slave files can't be shared even if they could be
shared.
Maybe you can write a program that translates the slave data
into the sharable format, and ev
, which is believable, but I did
not know the dumpdb was supposed to include history -- I thought it was
supposed to be a fully digested and cherent snapshot.
I have not had time to revist this, but I still do want to find out more.
Thanks.
--
Gordon A. Lang
- Original Message -
From: "
I expect query-source to apply to forwarded queries as well as
hint+cache driven recursive queries, but it does not on my system
running 9.4-ESV-R2.
Is this a known bug?
Has anyone else experienced this issue?
--
Gordon A. Lang
- Original Message -
From: "Gordon A. Lang"
ns it.
But that leaves two questions:
- Why didn't my log files include a message indicating the zones were
being rejected due to expiration?
- Does anyone know where the start up behavior is documented online?
Thanks.
--
Gordon A. Lang
- Original Message -
From: "
n why a slave should never load
from disk (in the event of a zone transfer failure)?
Thanks.
--
Gordon A. Lang
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
l I performed a hard
restart of named.
Has anyone else seen this sort of thing?
Can anyone explain this?
--
Gordon A. Lang
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
The "query-source" option does not work for forwarded queries per wireshark
with BIND 9.4-ESV-R2 on Solaris 10 as well as AIX 5.3.
If I remove the "forward only" option from named.conf, then the query-source
does take effect for the recursive queries (but of course the queries fail
because I need
slaves, with both instances sharing the same db files? If so, how
did you split each server i.e. did you use distinct ports or distinct
ip addresses or both? If not, then how did you manage to get a slave
zone to accept what you call "updates," which I presume you mean non-
dynamic updates, f
ould tell me where in the
source code I should look to find where the update-forward targets are
obtained so that I can evaluate what it would take for me to write my own
modifications.
Thanks.
--
Gordon A. Lang
- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Buxton"
To: "Gor
t point, I would
appreciate it. --- I would expect that if the masters list is used, then
ALL masters should always get the updates.
Thanks in advance.
--
Gordon A. Lang
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Andrews"
To: "Gordon A. Lang"
Cc:
Sent: Friday, April 09, 2010 5
st have to
wait for ISC to implement multi-master replication. Anyone know
when this might occur?
--
Gordon A. Lang
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
This can be
automated with scripts using rndc.
I'd be glad to help further, but more importantly I'd like to know how
well it works for you before I dare try it myself.
;-)
--
Gordon A. Lang / 313-819-7978___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
DNS off of the load balancers asap.
FWIW
--
Gordon A. Lang / 313-819-7978
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Steinar Haug wrote:
> Hello I wanted to ask how could be possible in some way
> to have 2 or more multi master name servers authoritative for one
> domain,
> instead of the classical master slave model.
Simple thing to do. I have a test lab here that I did this in a few
years
ago. 2 mas
all together.
It is much easier to manage than having to split the zones all over the
place, and it just works better.
--
Gordon A. Lang
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
oblems you've run into
using the CSS for anycast?
Thanks.
--
Gordon A. Lang
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
omplained about waiting 60 to 90 seconds before
their web pages would come up. That does not make sense to me because I
thought the second-configured resolver would be used within a few seconds.
Can any suggest why real life doesn't reflect what is written?
Thanks
24 matches
Mail list logo
