Red Cricket writes:
> Does anyone remember a project involving DNS at UCS where someone set up a
> dns server(s) to do arithmetic? If so can you reply with a link or
> something?
>
> Thanks
I assume you mean Bert's Secure Reverse Polish DNS Calculator
(BSRPDNSC)
Daniel Dawalibi writes:
>
> Hello
>
>
>
> Is there any tool or configuration that allows us to monitor/graph the
> number of outbound DNS queries toward the Root servers?
http://dnstop.measurement-factory.com/
jaap
___
Please
Matthew Horsfall (alh) writes:
Attempting to 'dig' for 'md' does something really weird. What am I
missing?
The dot. Use dig md. so dig doesn't take the md as the obsoleted
RR type md for mail destination.
There are more of those name clashes such as MX, CH etc.
jaap
Eray Aslan writes:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 07:26:28PM -0700, Carl Byington wrote:
On Fri, 2015-06-19 at 11:10 +1000, Mark Andrews wrote:
To use the keys in /etc/named.iscdlv.key set dnssec-validation
auto;
New centos rpms at http://www.five-ten-sg.com/mapper/bind with a default
Evan Hunt writes:
On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 09:46:16PM -0500, Grant Taylor wrote: I
think I saw a tweet with a figure around $185,000 US Dollars.I
wonder if that is on the low side.
I believe that's the fee to apply, per domain. Proof of ability to
provision and run a registry
I ask because I have indeed written a script which I will be running
on the order of once per day, and which needs to be able to suck
down a copy of the root zone. May I rely on this continuing to
some of the root-servers allow an axfr, but you are probably better off
looking at
You too are missing some A and records! Here is mine:
Use bufsize=4096 or at least something around 700, else the answer
doesn't fitand is truncated.
jaap
dig +bufsize=4096 . ns @198.41.0.4
; DiG 9.8.4-P1 +bufsize=4096 . ns @198.41.0.4
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got
Mark,
you remark somewhere that:
Additionally .local is reserved for mDNS ..
Make me wonder who reserved .local and specifically earmaked it to be
used for mDNS. Iana http://www.iana.org/domains/root/db/ doesn't seem
to know about this.
Can you give some references?
jaap
I agree for the consequence of those cache misses.
But doesnot that mean that RFC4035 needs amended to state :
remove atomic entry if *all* its RRSIGs get invalid
(because now it states : any = at least one)
And it implicitly confirms that these statements in the RFC
That is, if one can get the latest
version to compile under FreeBSD8.0. So far, the configure
process is one dependency after another and I have yet to see it
actually finish so that is shades of years gone by when
installing software was an art on good days.
Use the port,
10 matches
Mail list logo
