On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 11:29:27PM +0100, Cathy Almond wrote:
> On 20/06/2017 14:17, Maria Iano wrote:
>
> As has been explained already, no answer, no error means that the name
> exists, but not an RRset of the type you queried for.
>
> Since the ANY query also comes back empt
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 12:22:42PM -0400, wbr...@e1b.org wrote:
> Can you post a copy of the zone file, changing any server names that
> absolutely must be obscure?
>
Thank you for your help with this, and you are right, if I had sent you
the edited zone file that would have revealed the cause
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 05:39:46PM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
> note that existande of "something.sample" subdomain also means that
> "sample" exists and is empty.
>
That's it! They have www.deletedrecord in the zone! I missed it because
I was searching for deletedrecord* and not
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 10:08:44AM -0500, Bryan Bradsby wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-06-20 at 10:51 -0400, Maria Iano wrote:
> >
> > The queries are being directed at an authoritative server, exactly as
> > you describe above.
> >
> > We also pay for a secondary dns
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 09:37:04AM -0500, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 09:29:59AM -0500, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 09:17:58AM -0400, Maria Iano wrote:
> > > Thanks for your answer. There are no other records with that name
> > > in the z
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 09:29:59AM -0500, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 09:17:58AM -0400, Maria Iano wrote:
> > Thanks for your answer. There are no other records with that name
> > in the zone, and an ANY query comes back empty but still with
> > status of NOER
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 10:02:04AM -0400, wbr...@e1b.org wrote:
> > Thanks for your answer. There are no other records with that name in the
> > zone, and an ANY query comes back empty but still with status of
> > NOERROR. Unfortunately, I can't provide the query and zone data, and I
> > do
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 09:08:33PM -0500, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 06:19:31PM -0400, Maria Iano wrote:
> > We have a group of users that need to use a wildcard record in
> > their zone. Their wildcard works in general, but they have a
> > situation w
We have a group of users that need to use a wildcard record in their
zone. Their wildcard works in general, but they have a situation where it
isn't working. They had some records that they deleted, and expected
the wildcard to take over, but it hasn't. If we query a record that
doesn't exist and
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 05:56:31PM +, Evan Hunt wrote:
On the one hand: No, this is a bug, and I'd appreciate it if you'd
bundle up your named.conf (with key secrets stripped out; you can use
named-checkconf -px to do this automatically) and the details of the query
you sent to
We have a private internal TLD which I have our resolver pull as a slave zone
to prevent it failing dnssec. It has subdomains and normally our
resolver follows the delegations and resolves those correctly without
needing to pull slave copies.
If I use the option:
attach-cache globalcache;
and
I don't see this mentioned anywhere else, although I'm suprised by that
so maybe I'm missing something. When I build bind-9.10.2-P2 I find
that make test fails for reclimit with Couldn't start server ans2 if
I don't have Net::DNS::Nameserver installed. After I install it the
testing is successful.
What does it mean when the edns0 response to a dig says the overall packet size
will be one value but the message size reported is different. For example in
this reponse the OPT PSEUDOSECTION says udp: 4096 but at the end it says MSG
SIZE rcvd: 275.
$ dig www.google.com
; DiG
causing an outage to the
service/services. And if your not in control of the zone or the
search order it could be difficult to rectify.
-Stacey
On 11/11/2010 00:30, Kevin Darcy wrote:
On 11/10/2010 1:19 PM, Maria Iano wrote:
We are working with a software vendor whose software only works
We are working with a software vendor whose software only works with relative
hostnames - they say it can't cope with a fully-qualified domain name. They
want us to make sure the necessary domain is in all clients' search lists. Does
anyone have any good references for me to explanations of why
Maria Iano wrote:
My apologies if this is considered to be too off-topic.
I have a situation where my company uses a number of servers with a
commercial DNS implementation (in addition to our BIND servers).
The other implementation is Windows DNS, and there is some behavior
that I do
If I should not be sending this to this list please let me know.
Please let me know if you think I have this wrong:
Bare Minimum to be considered a usable DNS server (under limited
conditions):
When a zone is configured locally as a master or slave zone, only hand
out data from the local
My apologies if this is considered to be too off-topic.
I have a situation where my company uses a number of servers with a
commercial DNS implementation (in addition to our BIND servers). The
other implementation is Windows DNS, and there is some behavior that I
do not think is
18 matches
Mail list logo
