Yes, this bug can be fixed.
Just find a software developer and pay him some money. Or fix it
yourself, you have the code.
I suppose ISC does not want you to buy a paid support subscription to
fix this one but maybe they do, you could try contacting them.
Oh, wait. You must be wanting this
On 5/6/2022 12:45 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
in the past our CISCO ISP router with "DNS ALG" even rewrote zone
transfers and invented a zero TTL for each and every CNAME it saw
Probably doing that to retaliate for dynamic DNS providers abusing DNS
and people abusing dynamic DNS providers
On 5/5/2022 11:19 PM, Bjørn Mork wrote:
Mark Andrews writes:
How about configuring forwarder(s) if you have to operate a resolver in
such an environment? Hoping that the answer from the intercepting
server isn't too different from what you'd expect from a forwarder.
In my environment, I'
Thought I would document this in case anyone else gets bit by it
I have several nameservers and other servers on a Comcast copper
connection (cable internet) in the office using a Technicolor Business
Router CGA4131COM modem. This is Comcast's de-facto standard modem as
of 2022 for business
I have Comcast Business with 2 name servers behind it and 50 or so
domain names hosted on them. No problems at all. Never heard of
Security Edge.
We could have a discussion on your setup and compare notes but your
problems have nothing to do with port 53 filtering in the Comcast
network, IMHO.
I just became a maintainer on the apcupsd project.
I don't know if bind for windows is built like apcupsd is, by using
mingw32 but unfortunately there's problems with the mingw32 project
these days, it's gone through a lot of transitions.
Getting a working build environment for apcupsd at lea
to
use it.
Thank you so much.
Regards.
Dario Garcia
Díaz-Miguel
GGCS-SES Unit
GGCS SKMF Infrastructure Division
GMV
C\ de Isaac Newton, 11
28760, Tres Cantos, Madrid
España
+34 918 07 21 00
+34 918 07 21 99
www.gmv.com
-Mensaje original-
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 01:29:17 -0800
.
Thank you so much.
Regards.
Dario Garcia
Díaz-Miguel
GGCS-SES Unit
GGCS SKMF Infrastructure Division
GMV
C\ de Isaac Newton, 11
28760, Tres Cantos, Madrid
España
+34 918 07 21 00
+34 918 07 21 99
www.gmv.com
-Mensaje original-
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 01:29:17 -0800
From: Ted M
Instead of beating your head against DLZ can't you simply put the DLZ
query into stunnel and connect to the openldap server that way?
Ted
On 2/11/2021 10:39 PM, Dario García Díaz-Miguel wrote:
Hi there,
I really don't know If this is the correct place to ask about Bind DLZ, but I'm afraid
th
On 7/23/2020 7:44 AM, charlie derr wrote:
While it would still *technically* be security by obscurity, it would
seem to me that there's some value to this approach because access to
the compiled binary wouldn't necessarily be easy to obtain (especially
if the sysadmin provisioning the system
On 7/22/2020 9:59 PM, Michael De Roover wrote:
On 7/23/20 6:28 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Linux is 10 times worse because they aren't even including the c
compiler or development tools
anymore.
Every distribution I've laid my hands on so far has GCC packages and
most developmen
On 7/20/2020 4:05 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
Distributions also need to look at their own practices. They ask us
to supply long term support but do not actually integrate the
maintenance releases but instead cherry-pick just the security fixes.
Maintenance is not just security fixes. That me
On 7/20/2020 11:23 AM, Michael De Roover wrote:
If that is true, I hereby lost all faith in humanity.. well whatever
faith I had left. This has been going on for like half a decade now.
Nobody ever went broke catering to the human desire for ease
: bind-users [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Ted
Mittelstaedt
Sent: Friday, July 17, 2020 12:57 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: AW: Debian/Ubuntu: Why was the service renamed from bind9 to named?
Your personal experience is not the gobal truth. It is your opini
Your personal experience is not the gobal truth. It is your opinion but other
experienced pepole see it different than you.
Hmm I'm a bit late to this discussion but I will chime in with the
others. The service always was called "named" pronounced "name Dee"
it was called that in the Nutsh
On 6/14/2016 11:19 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
On 15/06/2016 10:29, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
On 6/14/2016 4:28 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
On 15/06/2016 05:38, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
It seems some on the list are short on philosophy? Well here is
the actual philosophy and I'll apologize in ad
On 6/14/2016 4:28 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
On 15/06/2016 05:38, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
It seems some on the list are short on philosophy? Well here is
the actual philosophy and I'll apologize in advance that it won't fit
in a SMS message for those people unable to have deep tho
On 6/14/2016 11:47 AM, Mukund Sivaraman wrote:
Hi Evan
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 05:45:59PM +, Evan Hunt wrote:
May I ask you to expand on why the MPL is a problem? So far the distros
have all been supportive.
The BSD camp dislikes copyleft because copyleft prevents exactly what
we're tr
On 6/14/2016 1:42 PM, Mukund Sivaraman wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 08:06:55PM +, Evan Hunt wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 12:38:14PM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
In reality, there IS no "middle ground" If you truly believe a
piece of software SHOULD be freely licensed,
It seems some on the list are short on philosophy? Well here is
the actual philosophy and I'll apologize in advance that it won't fit
in a SMS message for those people unable to have deep thoughts more
complex than a SMS message. Hopefully you are not one of them.
You are asking about GPL but
On 6/14/2016 10:45 AM, Evan Hunt wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 10:10:16AM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
I disagree with this but who am I to stand in the way of the goddam
almighty dollar, you're going to do it anyway regardless of what anyone
says, this comment thing is just w
I disagree with this but who am I to stand in the way of the goddam
almighty dollar, you're going to do it anyway regardless of what anyone
says, this comment thing is just window dressing.
I would request that you consider doing one thing before kicking all
the BSD distributions in the teeth
Did you compile both openssl and bind or are you using a prebuilt binary?
There are (apparently) problems with OpenSSL 1.0.2 on the 32 bit Solaris
10 platform. This was discussed on the openssl-users mailing list
a few months ago. The "fix" was building with an openssl 1.0.1
version on that pla
s then it's cost
them the same to send you to class vs paying you the extra time to
learn it yourself is the same.
Ted Mittelstaedt
Internet Partners, Inc.
On 4/26/2013 10:47 AM, rohan.he...@cwjamaica.com wrote:
Hello,
Can anyone say why Bind course offering appears so expensive? Is something e
Hi Peter,
Would you consider donating that script to ISC so they can bundle it
with the BIND distribution?
I have a whole library of scripts like yours which I've collected over
the last 10 years. Most of the hosts that are linked to as where these
scripts are located are long gone and the
arren said:
"...Many things (correctly (IMO)) ignore the info in additional section
due to past entertainment with cache poising, etc"
then what would be best practices for an ISP?
Ted
On 7/11/2012 8:03 AM, Warren Kumari wrote:
On Jul 11, 2012, at 6:30 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
On 7/10/2012 6:37 PM, Michael Hoskins (michoski) wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Ted Mittelstaedt
Date: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 6:24 PM
To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org"
Subject: What is the deal on missing "Authority Section" and
"additionalsection&q
Hi All,
I manage an ISP that runs BIND 9.6-ESV-R7-P1 (to be fair it was
running 9.6-ESV-R6 until an hour ago but I'm not that dumb to
post the location of an unpatched nameserver to the mailing list)
One of our customers reported that she was having problems with her
mailserver not sendi
28 matches
Mail list logo
