Dambier wrote:
Noel Butler wrote:
Firstly, I feel this really belongs on mailops not bind list :)
secondly...
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 00:00 +0300, Wael Shaheen wrote:
Blocking port 25 is much worse IMHO because it forces users out of the
service, by restricting their ability to use their own
Dear DNS Experts,
This post is intended for discussion.
The ISP I work for has HUGE dynamic IP pools that are full of spammers (of
course). This huge volume of spam is actually influencing the decision for
some of the international provider¹s whether to give us links or not let
alone the bad
users may choose to use their own
installed DNS service, but then again if your service provider has a stable
DNS service and a good and stable internet connection then would that
overcome this disadvantage? At the end I think that something has to be
sacrificed.
Sincerely,
Wael Shaheen
Hi,
On 1/31/10 5:28 PM, Sten Carlsen st...@s-carlsen.dk wrote:
To me this seems to be a firewall/routing issue. If you know for sure
that some IP is sending spam, if you can not stop them, then at least
you can block their outgoing access to port 25.
Most of the RBLs list dynamic IP
4 matches
Mail list logo
