t has been
> deprecated.
>
> As to this specific issue, I'm not sure. You might get more help from
> others, however, if you share your configuration. You can get a
> configuration scrubbed of keys using `named-checkconf -px`
>
> Thank you,
>
> Darren Ankney
>
> O
Hi Bind Users,
Any one familiar with the error we encountered on DNS BIND 9.18.2 Ubuntu
for DNS Caching, below;
We are using RPZ for redirecting domains (porn sites) where we already have
20k+ entries.
The domain (globem2m.com.ph) from below logs is not in the RPZ list but was
processed for RPZ
Hi Tale, Happy new year!
Your understanding is correct, i just thought that SRV can detect whose
server is alive so it can choose and provide an answer with the available
Server.
Thank you!
On Tue, 5 Jan 2021, 23:53 tale wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 4:30 AM Wilfred Sarmiento via b
Hi,
Is DNS Bind SRV record can detect the Server's availability? If yes, how?
Thank you,
Wil
--
This e-mail message (including attachments, if any) is intended for the use
of the individual or the entity to whom it is addressed and may contain
information that is privileged, proprietary,
ie @157.83.102.245
> > ;; global options: +cmd
> > ;; Got answer:
> > ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 20094
> > ;; flags: qr aa rd ad; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
> > ;; WARNING: recursion requested but not available
>
Hi Steinar,
Noted and thank you very much.
Regards.
*Wil*
On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 4:21 PM wrote:
> > The workaround works, does BIND 9.14 has a patch to resolve this? Since
> we
> > have a multiple Cache server, we need to do this every time we encounter
> > another domain that has this same
d; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
> ;; WARNING: recursion requested but not available
>
> ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
> ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096
> ;; QUESTION SECTION:
> ;federate-secure.glbaa.barclays.com. IN A
>
> ;; ANSWER SECTION:
> fed
rver 157.83.102.245 { send-cookie false; };
>
> See also
>
> https://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind9/9.14.0/doc/arm/Bv9ARM.ch05.html#server_statement_grammar
>
> Daniel
>
>
> On 06.11.19 08:32, Wilfred Sarmiento via bind-users wrote:
> > Hi Bind Users,
> >
Hi Bind Users,
Anyone have a similar issue we are encountering with the subdomain of
Barclays.com specifically federate.secure.barclays.com
Our cache server could not resolve the said subdomain, but was able to
resolve their root domain barclays.com and any other known domains.
Debug just showed
Hi Mark,
Another findings i got in the server is that it intermittently cannot
resolve an external domain.
Any more idea to what i should be checking here?
Thank you,
Wil
--
This e-mail message (including attachments, if any) is intended for the use
of the individual or the entity to whom it
IN A
>
> ;; ANSWER SECTION:
> book.cebupacair.cust.lldns.net. 300 IN CNAME cebupacair-dd.lldns.net.
> cebupacair-dd.lldns.net. 60 IN A 68.142.70.27
> cebupacair-dd.lldns.net. 60 IN A 68.142.68.27
>
> Mark
>
> > O
Hi Bind Users,
Currently drained my brain troubleshooting where could be the cause of my
issue on one of our Authoritative DNS server.
When querying a CNAME directly to the server, where a CNAME is pointed to
an external domain, results failed with timeout error and no server could
be reached.
12 matches
Mail list logo
