Re: Query - No Response

2010-04-29 Thread ic.nssip
...@internal.corp.ds, ic.nssip writ es: Hello everyone, I have a strange issue on a DNS server that is not able to resolve = www.cancer.ca [65.110.160.32]. If somebody has an idea about what is going wrong there, I will really = appreciate any suggestions on how to make it work. Here is my dig

Re: Query - No Response

2010-04-29 Thread ic.nssip
? Right now I'm using the same named.conf on both BIND versions, the only difference is the version of BIND. Thank you, Julian - Original Message - From: Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org To: ic.nssip ic.ns...@northwestel.net Cc: bind-us...@isc.org Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 6:04 AM Subject

DNS format error

2010-04-27 Thread ic.nssip
Hello everyone, I hope somebody can tell me why I'm getting so many DNS format error on a DNS Server running BIND 9.7.0 on a Solaris 10 machine. The server is resolving fine queries for normal traffic. Is just syslog that gets tones of messages like the ones in the next capture. The start

Re: how to ignore external queries?

2010-03-22 Thread ic.nssip
Subject: Re: how to ignore external queries? Em 19/03/2010 19:43, ic.nssip escreveu: and the results came up with a statement that External Queries are REJECTED and It would be better for it to ignore external queries. _Question is... How can I IGNORE External Queries instead of Rejecting them

how to ignore external queries?

2010-03-19 Thread ic.nssip
Hello everyone, I'm currently using an ACL for allow-query statement, which I thought it's fine. Recently I did a spoofability test on: https://www.grc.com/dns/dns.htm and the results came up with a statement that External Queries are REJECTED and It would be better for it to ignore external

Re: recursion

2010-03-11 Thread ic.nssip
Message - From: Kevin Darcy k...@chrysler.com To: bind-users@lists.isc.org Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 4:54 PM Subject: Re: recursion On 3/10/2010 4:45 PM, ic.nssip wrote: I've got the idea! So even I have no statement recursion yes, the server is still recursive as time I dont specify

recursion

2010-03-10 Thread ic.nssip
If there is no option recursion yes (or no); specified in named.conf, is the server still recursive? Is recursion activated by default if option recursion (yes|no) is missing in named.conf? Thank you, Julian ___ bind-users mailing list

Re: recursion

2010-03-10 Thread ic.nssip
I've got the idea! So even I have no statement recursion yes, the server is still recursive as time I dont specify recursion no; It is going to make no difference if I'll add recursion yes; on options. Is localnets a term I really need to use? Currently I'm using an ACL defined for acl

dnsquery for Solaris

2010-03-09 Thread ic.nssip
Hello everyone, Can somebody suggest a place where from I can download dnsquery source/pkg to make it work on Solaris 10? I have it installed on a FreeBSD machine but imported to Solaris is reporting some syntax error # dnsquery www.google.com dnsquery: syntax error at line 1: `(' unexpected

Re: dnsquery for Solaris

2010-03-09 Thread ic.nssip
dependencies? Is any chance I can find a Windows version of this dnsquery command (as there is one distribution only for dig)? Thank you, Julian On Mar 9 2010, Sam Wilson wrote: In article mailman.747.1268158060.21153.bind-us...@lists.isc.org, ic.nssip ic.ns...@northwestel.net wrote: I find

Re: dnsquery for Solaris

2010-03-09 Thread ic.nssip
What I'm trying to do is to find a way to get the TTL left for a cached record. I usually use dnsquery like this (12m23s and 9m53s is what interest me): # dnsquery -n 8.8.8.8 -t a ftp.funet.fi ;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 47912 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1,

Re: dnsquery for Solaris

2010-03-09 Thread ic.nssip
Yup! That's what I need. Thank you for all suggestion! Best Wishes! Julian ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Loopback alias

2010-03-04 Thread ic.nssip
Hello everyone, When running make test on a BIND 9.7.0 installed on a x86 SUN Solaris 10 machine, I've got this message: I:NOTE: Many of the tests were skipped because they require that I: the IP addresses 10.53.0.1 through 10.53.0.5 are configured I: as alias addresses on the

Re: Loopback alias

2010-03-04 Thread ic.nssip
Hi Mark, Thank you for your prompt answer and for taking off my worries that I'm missing something there. Best Regards, Julian - Original Message - From: Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org To: ic.nssip ic.ns...@northwestel.net Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2010 1

Re: ISC BIND 9.7.0 is now available

2010-02-19 Thread ic.nssip
Hi Doug, I just installed from a local compiled bind-9.7.0.tar.gz with all ISC defalt settings and the issue is gone. Thank you, Julian - Original Message - From: Doug Barton do...@dougbarton.us To: ic.nssip ic.ns...@northwestel.net Cc: Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org; bind-users

Re: ISC BIND 9.7.0 syslog recorded notices

2010-02-19 Thread ic.nssip
I just installed ISC 9.7.0 on one of our x86 SUN Solaris 10 machines. I did a fresh local compiled install with all default settings. It looks that DNS is working fine for customers (anyway the time is too short to conclude that), but my syslog suddenly got populated with tones of daemon.notice

Re: ISC BIND 9.7.0 is now available

2010-02-18 Thread ic.nssip
/include/lzo' 'CXX=g++' 'CXXFLAGS=-fpermissive -felide-constructors' Thank you, Julian - Original Message - From: Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org To: ic.nssip ic.ns...@northwestel.net Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 5:06 PM Subject: Re: ISC BIND 9.7.0 is now

BIND 9.6.1-P1

2009-07-31 Thread ic.nssip
Does anyone knows if there is any solaris .pkg distribution for BIND 9.6.1-P1? Im looking to replace old versions as per: https://www.isc.org/node/474 Thank you, Julian___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org

BIND 9.6.1-P1

2009-07-31 Thread ic.nssip
Does anyone knows if there is any solaris .pkg distribution for BIND 9.6.1-P1? Im looking to replace old versions as per: https://www.isc.org/node/474 Thank you, Julian___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org

Re: Bind 9.6.1 stops after few hours.

2009-07-03 Thread ic.nssip
I'm using 9.6.1 from sunfreeware.com on a x86 IBM dual core (Solaris 10) and never had a problem with it. Good luck! Julian - Original Message - From: Laurence Stendard To: bind-users@lists.isc.org Sent: Friday, July 03, 2009 2:31 PM Subject: Bind 9.6.1 stops after few

Re: DNS MX timeouts

2009-06-26 Thread ic.nssip
I had the same problem yesterday with two servers running BIND 9.5.0-P2 on SPARC Solaris 8. I had to kill the process few times and finally it worked. After a time it failed again to resolve MX records for the same users. I updated the root zone (it had some old records) and it never failed

Bind 9 Configuration and Statistics

2009-04-11 Thread ic.nssip
Greetings everyone, I have only a little question about Bind 9 Configuration and Statistics page. I activated statistics-channels on a 9.5.0-P2 and a 9.6.0 DNS Server. I'm not getting any records for: - Outgoing Queries from View _default - Outgoing Queries from View _bind - Cache DB RRsets for