Re: [Architecture discussion] IPv6 and best practices for DNS naming and the MX/SMTP problem

2013-06-06 Thread Andreas Meile
Hello Carsten and Kevin Thanks for your answers. As a short summary, I will use (and recommend) the following ways: - consider .local/.loc/.intra/.lan etc. as legacy which should be eliminated (Microsoft officially supports Active Directory domain renaming procedures for that). - preferred

Re: [Architecture discussion] IPv6 and best practices for DNS naming and the MX/SMTP problem

2013-05-28 Thread Kevin Darcy
On 5/26/2013 2:36 PM, Andreas Meile wrote: Hello BIND users The following post discusses some complexer questions in context with enabling dual-stack in corporate networks. It's very TCP/IP generic but has also a lot to do with DNS (and of course BIND which I use to implement it = all

Re: [Architecture discussion] IPv6 and best practices for DNS naming and the MX/SMTP problem

2013-05-27 Thread Carsten Strotmann
Hello Andreas, Andreas Meile mailingli...@andreas-meile.ch writes: First question for discussion: Is it recommended to replace example.local into intra.example.com for example because it's now possible to restore the public DNS hierarchy? See the following: In my view, using a namespace

[Architecture discussion] IPv6 and best practices for DNS naming and the MX/SMTP problem

2013-05-26 Thread Andreas Meile
Hello BIND users The following post discusses some complexer questions in context with enabling dual-stack in corporate networks. It's very TCP/IP generic but has also a lot to do with DNS (and of course BIND which I use to implement it = all examples are in BIND syntax) so I hope it's not too