Re: [Ext] Re: Redirect only second and third level domains

2017-02-28 Thread Andrea Gabellini
Hi, thank you all for the replies. "Don't do it" was also my first thought. Andrea Il 24/02/2017 21:19, /dev/rob0 ha scritto: > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 02:05:54PM -0500, Warren Kumari wrote: >> -- >> I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously >> a bad idea in the first

Re: [Ext] Re: Redirect only second and third level domains

2017-02-24 Thread /dev/rob0
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 02:05:54PM -0500, Warren Kumari wrote: > -- > I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously > a bad idea in the first place. > This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later > expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid > weasels

Re: [Ext] Re: Redirect only second and third level domains

2017-02-24 Thread Warren Kumari
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 1:12 PM, Edward Lewis wrote: > On 2/24/17, 03:42, "bind-users on behalf of Andrea Gabellini" wrote: > >>the server is a resolver for about 20K clients. My goal is to supply a >>courtesy page if a domain is not found. For every domain. > > No

Re: [Ext] Re: Redirect only second and third level domains

2017-02-24 Thread Edward Lewis
On 2/24/17, 03:42, "bind-users on behalf of Andrea Gabellini" wrote: >the server is a resolver for about 20K clients. My goal is to supply a >courtesy page if a domain is not found. For every domain. No approach relying on wildcards will work because of the way wildcards "work."