Re: 9.9.1 continues to sign with inactive KSK

2012-05-25 Thread Axel Rau
Am 25.05.2012 um 14:16 schrieb Tony Finch: > Axel Rau wrote: >> >> The tags of the KSKs with their dates are (set with dnssec-settime): >> --- >> [framail.de/KSK/1699/8(A:2012-05-23T17:55:02, I:2012-05-27T17:55:02, >> D:2012-05-28T17:55:02)] >> [framail.de/KSK/46210/8(A:2012-05-20T16:55:03, I:

Re: 9.9.1 continues to sign with inactive KSK

2012-05-25 Thread Tony Finch
Axel Rau wrote: > > The tags of the KSKs with their dates are (set with dnssec-settime): > --- > [framail.de/KSK/1699/8(A:2012-05-23T17:55:02, I:2012-05-27T17:55:02, > D:2012-05-28T17:55:02)] > [framail.de/KSK/46210/8(A:2012-05-20T16:55:03, I:2012-05-24T16:55:03, > D:2012-05-25T16:55:03)] > ---

9.9.1 continues to sign with inactive KSK

2012-05-25 Thread Axel Rau
Hi all, there is a KSK roll over running for framail.de. Its a inline-signing maintain configuration, upgraded fron 9.9.0. The tags of the KSKs with their dates are (set with dnssec-settime): --- [framail.de/KSK/1699/8(A:2012-05-23T17:55:02, I:2012-05-27T17:55:02, D:2012-05-28T17:55:02)] [framail