Thanks for the suggestion. My intention for now is to trial on a laptop as
that give me the maximum flexibility for testing.
/bill
On Thursday 05 November 2015 17:44, Mark Andrews wrote:
> In message <201511051124.03206.boobe...@rogers.com>, Bill writes:
> > Yes, to do a full implementation
Mark,
> may want to add a "_dns-update._udp.example.net SRV" record pointing
> to the nameservers as someone convinced the router vendor(s) that
> this is how you do it
Is this a standard? Other than [1], which insinuates it's an Apple-only
thing, the Goog turns up only 55 hits for
In message <20151106120047.ga69...@tiggr.ww.mens.de>, Jan-Piet Mens writes:
> Mark,
>
> > may want to add a "_dns-update._udp.example.net SRV" record pointing
> > to the nameservers as someone convinced the router vendor(s) that
> > this is how you do it
>
> Is this a standard? Other than [1],
Yes, to do a full implementation usable in an enterprise you are correct, but
what I am looking for is a small demo with only 10 machines or so. I believe
your comment about IPv5 is correct too, but I am limited for this trial.
/bill
On Wednesday 04 November 2015 15:30, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
In message <201511051124.03206.boobe...@rogers.com>, Bill writes:
> Yes, to do a full implementation usable in an enterprise you are correct, but
>
> what I am looking for is a small demo with only 10 machines or so. I believe
>
> your comment about IPv5 is correct too, but I am limited for
In message <563c3477.6070...@tnetconsulting.net>, Grant Taylor writes:
> On 11/05/2015 03:44 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
> > You may want to add a "_dns-update._udp.example.net SRV" record
> > pointing to the nameservers as someone convinced the router vendor(s)
> > that this is how you do it rather
On 11/05/2015 03:44 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
> You may want to add a "_dns-update._udp.example.net SRV" record
> pointing to the nameservers as someone convinced the router vendor(s)
> that this is how you do it rather than that being a override to the
> default of just sending to the nameservers
On 11/05/2015 10:13 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
> The UPDATE standard say ANY of the nameservers but to prefer the
> server which matches the MNAME.
I have yet to find a DNS server that will support updates to a slave
server out of the box.
Bind slave servers can easily be configured forward Dynamic
If you want this sort of behaviour you are going to have to pay
someone someone lots of money to add this sort of functionality to
a nameserver and then pay them more money to maintain it. This
sort of thing does not exist in normal nameservers.
Nameservers don't normally do other things on DNS
On 11/04/2015 08:45 AM, Bill wrote:
> You are correct, but in the use case I am looking at there is no Internet
> connection.
I think "other network(s)" can substitute "Internet" in this context.
> What I am trying to do is to be able to connect to s specific device, say a
> 'supervisor' by
See my last posting on what I am trying to achieve, I think in the interest of
brevity I may have overly simplified my goal.
What I want is for the DNS query to automatically configure the NAT to permit
the outside connection. In other words it should, after the DNS query, look
as if the
You are correct, but in the use case I am looking at there is no Internet
connection. There are a small number of mobile devices (5-15) behind a NAT
gateway with DNS. The gateway provides service to other small networks, but
there is nothing else connected, it is an isolated system.
What I
I was thinking of doing the DNS and the NAT on the same device, then (I
assume) the DNS could use connection tracking hooks to add 'expectations' to
the NAT. Anyhow, that was what I was hoping, but I've not been able to find
out much about anyone having done such a thing, so I might be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 2015-10-30 at 12:38 -0400, Bill wrote:
> What I would like to do to have the ability to query a DNS server
> located behind a NAT, and have it return the IP of the NAT, and setup
> connection tracking in the NAT to pass traffic thru to the
On 2015-11-02 15:03, Carl Byington wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 2015-10-30 at 12:38 -0400, Bill wrote:
>What I would like to do to have the ability to query a DNS server
>located behind a NAT, and have it return the IP of the NAT, and setup
>connection tracking
the DNS-ALG can't be handeled on the nameserver itself, it does not know
anything about the NAT, the device doing the NAT knows
hence the implementation is typically on the edge router
Am 30.10.2015 um 17:38 schrieb Bill:
Thanks for your remarks. What I am actually looking at is research in
Thanks for your remarks. What I am actually looking at is research in mobile
networks where I'd like devices that may or may not be connected to be
accessible by name. The devices might have different IP addresses when they
connect and I don't want any connection to them to be able to keep an
Yes, I am also looking a tools to update DNS when IP address changes.
/bill
On Saturday 24 October 2015 17:35, Mark Andrews wrote:
> Get yourself IPv6 and forget about the NAT. Complain to your ISP
> if they don't supply IPv6. They should be able to as they have had
> two decades to prepare
you *really* do not want that
have been punished more than one time by cisco routers having that crap
enabled and breaking DNS in various ways including mangle zone transfers
and set the TTL of every CNAME to 0 instead leave it untouched or just
break zone transfers silently at all
setup
Get yourself IPv6 and forget about the NAT. Complain to your ISP
if they don't supply IPv6. They should be able to as they have had
two decades to prepare for the fact the IPv4 addresses have run
out. That way you don't have to worry about different internal and
external addresses.
Even
I was wondering if anyone has looked at or is is the process of adding DNS ALG
support, or something similar, to bind?
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2694
What I would like to do to have the ability to query a DNS server located
behind a NAT, and have it return the IP of the NAT, and setup
21 matches
Mail list logo
