On Tue, 2013-06-25 at 17:20 +0100, Phil Mayers wrote:
> On 25/06/13 16:53, John Horne wrote:
>
> > servers. However, there is a whole load of muttering that Microsoft and
> > AD won't like that; it's all integrated with each other; running the DNS
> > zone on Linux servers will be a problem with t
On 25.06.13 15:32, John Horne wrote:
If, however, you run a general query for the NS records:
dig 163.141.in-addr.arpa ns
then you will get an ANSWER section which lists several of our 'ils'
servers:
==
;; ANSWER SECTION:
163.141.in-addr.arpa. 3600 IN NSils022.uopnet.ply
On Jun 25, 2013, at 7:32 AM, John Horne wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am having a bit of trouble understanding what happens when, in this
> instance, a DNS reverse lookup occurs. Our site has the class-C
> 141.163.0.0 address range. If I perform reverse lookups from inside or
> outside our site, then th
On Tue, 2013-06-25 at 17:07 +0100, Steven Carr wrote:
> On 25 June 2013 16:53, John Horne wrote:
> > So what I now do not understand is why (at home) I can do several
> > reverse lookups for different IP addresses, and they all give me an
> > answer. Likewise if I do something like:
> >
> >dig
On 25/06/13 16:53, John Horne wrote:
servers. However, there is a whole load of muttering that Microsoft and
AD won't like that; it's all integrated with each other; running the DNS
zone on Linux servers will be a problem with the MS servers etc etc.
I'm sure you know this, but just in case -
On 25 June 2013 16:53, John Horne wrote:
> So what I now do not understand is why (at home) I can do several
> reverse lookups for different IP addresses, and they all give me an
> answer. Likewise if I do something like:
>
>dig -x 141.163.99.16 @8.8.8.8
>
> I get a non-authoritative answer. I
On Tue, 2013-06-25 at 10:46 -0400, Barry Margolin wrote:
>
> In addition, the authoritative answer may contain an Authority section.
> These nameservers take precedence over the NS records from the
> delegation -- the assumption is that the authoritative server knows its
> domain's nameservers m
In article ,
John Horne wrote:
> So I think my question is what is the resolver doing? Does it use cached
> NS records seen in the AUTHORITY section, or does it use NS records seen
> in an ANSWER section? Or is it working its way down until it receives an
> authoritative answer ('aa' flag set),
Hello,
I am having a bit of trouble understanding what happens when, in this
instance, a DNS reverse lookup occurs. Our site has the class-C
141.163.0.0 address range. If I perform reverse lookups from inside or
outside our site, then they seem to work fine. However, we are currently
investigating
9 matches
Mail list logo
