On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:58 AM, project722 wrote:
> I have moved the new views into production, and all seems to be working
> fine. I have an "internal" view and an "external" view. I have noticed a
> few re-occuring messages in the logs of the master server that I'd like to
> suppress. Here is
I have moved the new views into production, and all seems to be working
fine. I have an "internal" view and an "external" view. I have noticed a
few re-occuring messages in the logs of the master server that I'd like to
suppress. Here is what I am seeing:
1) Warning: view external: 'empty-zones-en
I am not seeing that but thanks for the heads up. I will keep an eye on it.
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Bob Harold wrote:
> I changed the subject slightly, because I had to cut out a lot of the
> forwarded message - the list server was complaining about the size of the
> messages.
>
> I jus
I changed the subject slightly, because I had to cut out a lot of the
forwarded message - the list server was complaining about the size of the
messages.
I just found that my setup was not working completely as I expected. The
view with only a few zones and forwarding to another view automaticall
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 12:49 PM, project722 wrote:
> Bob, I have few questions regarding your sample config. First off it is
> slightly different than mine, which does work BTW at least in a lab
> environment. In your internal view what is the purpose of having this line:
>
> // this list must n
Bob, I have few questions regarding your sample config. First off it is
slightly different than mine, which does work BTW at least in a lab
environment. In your internal view what is the purpose of having this line:
// this list must not match 127.0.0.1
!key "external"; // use t
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 12:34 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 11:48:54AM -0400, Bob Harold wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 11:37 AM, project722
> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Bob, I will look into this. Do you know if the forwarders
> > > feature is supported in Bind 9.8.2?
> > >
> >
On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 11:48:54AM -0400, Bob Harold wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 11:37 AM, project722 wrote:
>
> > Thanks Bob, I will look into this. Do you know if the forwarders
> > feature is supported in Bind 9.8.2?
> >
> Yes, forwarders is an old and stable feature.
>
> ("in-view" is n
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 11:37 AM, project722 wrote:
> Thanks Bob, I will look into this. Do you know if the forwarders feature
> is supported in Bind 9.8.2?
>
>
Yes, forwarders is an old and stable feature.
("in-view" is new and experimental)
--
Bob Harold
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Bo
Thanks Bob, I will look into this. Do you know if the forwarders feature is
supported in Bind 9.8.2?
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Bob Harold wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 5:23 PM, project722 wrote:
>
>> I'm interested in the "view forwarding" method. I'm only setting up views
>> to resol
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 5:23 PM, project722 wrote:
> I'm interested in the "view forwarding" method. I'm only setting up views
> to resolve a split DNS issue with one domain. I'd like to have that one
> zone/domain in my internal view and then if the source IP requests info for
> any other zone fo
On 06.09.16 16:23, project722 wrote:
I'm interested in the "view forwarding" method. I'm only setting up views
to resolve a split DNS issue with one domain. I'd like to have that one
zone/domain in my internal view and then if the source IP requests info for
any other zone forward that to my exte
I'm interested in the "view forwarding" method. I'm only setting up views
to resolve a split DNS issue with one domain. I'd like to have that one
zone/domain in my internal view and then if the source IP requests info for
any other zone forward that to my external view. To me this sounds like a
who
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 12:56 PM, project722 wrote:
> I have successfully setup TSIG keys for "views" using a DNS master/server
> pair. Zone transfers are working as expected between the 2 servers for each
> view. Before we go live into production with this I need some clarification
> on a couple
I have successfully setup TSIG keys for "views" using a DNS master/server
pair. Zone transfers are working as expected between the 2 servers for each
view. Before we go live into production with this I need some clarification
on a couple things. Our prod servers are also allowing zone transfers to
15 matches
Mail list logo