Re: Deprecation notice for BIND 9: "resolver-nonbackoff-tries", "resolver-retry-interval"

2023-12-08 Thread Evan Hunt
On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 04:05:03PM -0800, Fred Morris wrote: > They don't seem well documented. Indeed they are not! > I say go ahead, if nothing else consider it a "scream test". But can you > take a moment and tell us which stakeholder group(s) you think you're > optimizing for, why, and how?

Re: Deprecation notice for BIND 9: "resolver-nonbackoff-tries", "resolver-retry-interval"

2023-12-08 Thread G.W. Haywood
Hi there, On Fri, 8 Dec 2023, Fred Morris wrote: I welcome birds of a feather. Need to define / refine the problem statement first. ... ... Er, tweet! Up to my @$$ in aligators and can't afford the time to more than chime in here, but this is all absolutely fascinating. Fwiw I'd love to

Re: Deprecation notice for BIND 9: "resolver-nonbackoff-tries", "resolver-retry-interval"

2023-12-07 Thread Petr Špaček
On 07. 12. 23 22:12, Fred Morris wrote: I welcome birds of a feather. Need to define / refine the problem statement first. On 12/7/23 12:30 AM, Petr Špaček wrote: On 07. 12. 23 1:05, Fred Morris wrote: On Wed, 6 Dec 2023, Evan Hunt wrote: I say go ahead, if nothing else consider it a "scream

Re: Deprecation notice for BIND 9: "resolver-nonbackoff-tries", "resolver-retry-interval"

2023-12-07 Thread Fred Morris
I welcome birds of a feather. Need to define / refine the problem statement first. On 12/7/23 12:30 AM, Petr Špaček wrote: > On 07. 12. 23 1:05, Fred Morris wrote: >> On Wed, 6 Dec 2023, Evan Hunt wrote: >> I say go ahead, if nothing else consider it a "scream test". But can >> you take a moment

Re: Deprecation notice for BIND 9: "resolver-nonbackoff-tries", "resolver-retry-interval"

2023-12-07 Thread Petr Špaček
On 07. 12. 23 1:05, Fred Morris wrote: On Wed, 6 Dec 2023, Evan Hunt wrote: I say go ahead, if nothing else consider it a "scream test". But can you take a moment and tell us which stakeholder group(s) you think you're optimizing for, why, and how? On the technical level we optimize using

Re: Deprecation notice for BIND 9: "resolver-nonbackoff-tries", "resolver-retry-interval"

2023-12-06 Thread Fred Morris
They don't seem well documented. Even in the ARM for 9.12 they're listed as options but no explanation is provided. It's easy to suspect that nobody is going to use an option which isn't documented (unless they're of a mind to browse sourcecode). This could be a self-fulfilling assumption. On

Deprecation notice for BIND 9: "resolver-nonbackoff-tries", "resolver-retry-interval"

2023-12-06 Thread Evan Hunt
Hello, In line with ISC's deprecation policy, I am notifying the mailing list of our intent to deprecate the "resolver-nonbackoff-tries" and "resolver-retry-interval" options in named. These options fine-tune query retry behavior in the resolver for testing purposes. They are not thought to be