Re: Dropping queries from some well-known ports

2018-08-03 Thread Timothe Litt
On 03-Aug-18 14:00, Petr Menšík wrote: > Hi! > > Our internal support reached to me with question, why are some queries > bound to low ports silently dropped. I have found there is feature for > that, that will silently drop queries from selected ports. > > I admit queries from such low ports are

Re: Dropping queries from some well-known ports

2018-08-03 Thread Carl Byington
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Fri, 2018-08-03 at 20:00 +0200, Petr Mensik wrote: > 1. > https://gitlab.isc.org/isc- > projects/bind9/commit/05d32f6b0f6590ca22136b753309f070ce769000 If I am reading the code correctly, that commit implies that building bind with

Re: Dropping queries from some well-known ports

2018-08-03 Thread Grant Taylor via bind-users
On 08/03/2018 12:00 PM, Petr Menšík wrote: Hi! Hi, Our internal support reached to me with question, why are some queries bound to low ports silently dropped. Please clarify if you're saying "bound to" as in the code that originated the query came from said port or if you mean queries

Re: Dropping queries from some well-known ports

2018-08-03 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 03.08.18 20:00, Petr Menšík wrote: Our internal support reached to me with question, why are some queries bound to low ports silently dropped. I have found there is feature for that, that will silently drop queries from selected ports. I admit queries from such low ports are wrong. But why

Dropping queries from some well-known ports

2018-08-03 Thread Petr Menšík
Hi! Our internal support reached to me with question, why are some queries bound to low ports silently dropped. I have found there is feature for that, that will silently drop queries from selected ports. I admit queries from such low ports are wrong. But why are some ports allowed when some