On 12/15/2016 8:16 AM, Bob Harold wrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Veaceslav Revutchi
> wrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Barry S. Finkel > wrote:
> On 12/14/2016
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Veaceslav Revutchi wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Barry S. Finkel
> wrote:
> > On 12/14/2016 Veaceslav Revutchi wrote:
> >
> >> Since this thread is still fresh, what is the
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Barry S. Finkel wrote:
> On 12/14/2016 Veaceslav Revutchi wrote:
>
>> Since this thread is still fresh, what is the current best practice
>> when slaving from AD? Do you pick one DC and list it as master or is
>> it
On 12/14/2016 Veaceslav Revutchi wrote:
Since this thread is still fresh, what is the current best practice
when slaving from AD? Do you pick one DC and list it as master or is
it safe to list multiple? We are looking to do the same and just
started the conversation
- Kevin
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: bind-users [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Barry
> S. Finkel
> Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 10:29 AM
> To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
> Subject: Re: Enterprise D
ists.isc.org
Subject: Re: Enterprise DNS Architecture - AD and BIND
On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 16:09:36 -0800 Ray Van Dolson <rvandol...@esri.com>
wrote:
> Greetings;
>
> Am reviewing our DNS setup which has organically evolved over the
> years and most certainly is due for an update:
&
On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 16:09:36 -0800 Ray Van Dolson
wrote:
Greetings;
Am reviewing our DNS setup which has organically evolved over the years
and most certainly is due for an update:
- We have AD servers responsible for our primary domain (internally).
- We have other
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 01:11:16AM +, Baird, Josh wrote:
I'm not quite sure why you would have your caching servers forward to
other DNS servers (Google, OpenDNS, etc). I would enable recursion
on them and would not forward anything. I would also consider
making these caching servers at
On 08.11.16 16:09, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
What I'm thinking:
- Have an AD server at every location we have a BIND server. This way
client machines talk DNS *only* to AD servers so Dynamic DNS &
friends work reliably. AD servers would then forward to BIND servers
as needed.
This could
slave your AD zones as well.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Josh
>
> -Original Message-
> From: bind-users [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Ray
> Van Dolson
> Sent: Tuesday, November 8, 2016 7:10 PM
> To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
> Subject: Enterprise DNS
@lists.isc.org
Subject: Enterprise DNS Architecture - AD and BIND
Greetings;
Am reviewing our DNS setup which has organically evolved over the years and
most certainly is due for an update:
- We have AD servers responsible for our primary domain (internally).
- We have other sets of AD servers
Greetings;
Am reviewing our DNS setup which has organically evolved over the years
and most certainly is due for an update:
- We have AD servers responsible for our primary domain (internally).
- We have other sets of AD servers responsible for other domains in
DMZ's and such.
- We have a
12 matches
Mail list logo