Re: IPv6 Records on an IPv4 Network

2010-07-24 Thread Phil Mayers
On 07/24/2010 03:57 AM, Danny Mayer wrote: Applications that depend on specific behaviors are broken. You should I think we're going to have to agree to disagree here. ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailma

Re: IPv6 Records on an IPv4 Network

2010-07-23 Thread Danny Mayer
On 7/23/2010 8:50 AM, Phil Mayers wrote: > On 23/07/10 13:23, Danny Mayer wrote: >> On 7/22/2010 11:33 AM, Phil Mayers wrote: >>> On 22/07/10 12:19, Rock July wrote: Windows Vista and 7 clients will query both type A and query even >>> >>> The OS might make the query, but the application

RE: IPv6 Records on an IPv4 Network

2010-07-23 Thread Vyto Grigaliunas
--Original Message- > From: bind-users-bounces+vyto=fnal@lists.isc.org [mailto:bind- > users-bounces+vyto=fnal@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Phil Mayers > Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 7:50 AM > To: ma...@gis.net > Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org > Subject: Re: IPv6 Records

Re: IPv6 Records on an IPv4 Network

2010-07-23 Thread Phil Mayers
On 23/07/10 13:23, Danny Mayer wrote: On 7/22/2010 11:33 AM, Phil Mayers wrote: On 22/07/10 12:19, Rock July wrote: Windows Vista and 7 clients will query both type A and query even The OS might make the query, but the application will (should) be using getaddrinfo, and this will return

Re: IPv6 Records on an IPv4 Network

2010-07-23 Thread Danny Mayer
On 7/22/2010 11:33 AM, Phil Mayers wrote: > On 22/07/10 12:19, Rock July wrote: >> Windows Vista and 7 clients will query both type A and query even > > The OS might make the query, but the application will (should) be using > getaddrinfo, and this will return the IPv4 addresses first, so it

Re: IPv6 Records on an IPv4 Network

2010-07-22 Thread Phil Mayers
On 22/07/10 16:45, Alan Clegg wrote: On 7/22/2010 8:33 AM, Phil Mayers wrote: only IPv4 interface is enabled. If I put the option "filter--on-v4 {yes;};", will my DNS reject the queries? This option breaks DNSSEC. Actually, it doesn't. If the DO bit is set in the query, the defaul

Re: IPv6 Records on an IPv4 Network

2010-07-22 Thread Alan Clegg
On 7/22/2010 8:33 AM, Phil Mayers wrote: >> only IPv4 interface is enabled. If I put the option "filter--on-v4 >> {yes;};", will my DNS reject the queries? > > This option breaks DNSSEC. Actually, it doesn't. If the DO bit is set in the query, the default behavior (I'll let you dig to

Re: IPv6 Records on an IPv4 Network

2010-07-22 Thread Phil Mayers
On 22/07/10 12:19, Rock July wrote: Windows Vista and 7 clients will query both type A and query even The OS might make the query, but the application will (should) be using getaddrinfo, and this will return the IPv4 addresses first, so it doesn't matter. only IPv4 interface is enable

Re: IPv6 Records on an IPv4 Network

2010-07-22 Thread Martin McCormick
Phil Mayers writes: > If IPv6 is turned off, the windows machines should not be registering IPv6 > addresses. Maybe IPv6 was turned on in the past, and they haven't been > garbage-collected for some reason? (Windows DNS records which were > inserted > by dynamic update are supposed to be garbage c

Re: IPv6 Records on an IPv4 Network

2010-07-22 Thread Rock July
c.org Sent: Thu, July 22, 2010 3:45:29 PM Subject: Re: IPv6 Records on an IPv4 Network On 07/21/2010 10:10 PM, Martin McCormick wrote: >     This is admittedly not a bind question, but it has > become a major nag factor and I am not sure what to recommend. > >     We delegate our Microsoft

Re: IPv6 Records on an IPv4 Network

2010-07-22 Thread Phil Mayers
On 07/21/2010 10:10 PM, Martin McCormick wrote: This is admittedly not a bind question, but it has become a major nag factor and I am not sure what to recommend. We delegate our Microsoft Active Directory zone to Microsoft domain controllers and they have stuffed their zone with

IPv6 Records on an IPv4 Network

2010-07-21 Thread Martin McCormick
This is admittedly not a bind question, but it has become a major nag factor and I am not sure what to recommend. We delegate our Microsoft Active Directory zone to Microsoft domain controllers and they have stuffed their zone with about 750 AAA records and all are publicly visible