Re: KSK stays published 3 days after delete time

2012-05-11 Thread Axel Rau
Am 10.05.2012 um 23:52 schrieb Evan Hunt: key 22924 of framail.de has a delete date of 2012-05-07T14:55:02 set. It has been deleted from the repository at 2012-05-07T14:55:02.569706, but is still included by named 9.9.0 in the zone framail.de (as of 2012-05-10T19:51:32). To clarify: I'm

KSK stays published 3 days after delete time

2012-05-10 Thread Axel Rau
All, key 22924 of framail.de has a delete date of 2012-05-07T14:55:02 set. It has been deleted from the repository at 2012-05-07T14:55:02.569706, but is still included by named 9.9.0 in the zone framail.de (as of 2012-05-10T19:51:32). Is this a bug, triggered by my timing? Should I wait one more

Re: KSK stays published 3 days after delete time

2012-05-10 Thread Alexander Gurvitz
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Axel Rau axel@chaos1.de wrote: Did you delete it manually (at 2012-05-07T14:55:02.569706) ? Yes; i.e. my script. If so, maybe it's still in the zone because BIND doesn't know the timing metadata anymore ? I thought that would be in the journal or

Re: KSK stays published 3 days after delete time

2012-05-10 Thread Evan Hunt
key 22924 of framail.de has a delete date of 2012-05-07T14:55:02 set. It has been deleted from the repository at 2012-05-07T14:55:02.569706, but is still included by named 9.9.0 in the zone framail.de (as of 2012-05-10T19:51:32). To clarify: I'm using inline-signing. The repository is

Re: KSK stays published 3 days after delete time

2012-05-10 Thread Mark Andrews
In message CABUciRkMv4HRwvwvqe=z+=xkw9ccjhntzpmy6sfa4l+tzej...@mail.gmail.com , Alexander Gurvitz writes: On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Axel Rau axel@chaos1.de wrote: Did you delete it manually (at 2012-05-07T14:55:02.569706) ? Yes; i.e. my script. If so, maybe it's still in the