On 11/18/15, 1:19 PM, "bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org on behalf of Carl
Byington" wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 10:47 -0500, Barry Margolin wrote:
>> While that's the pedantically correct answer, in practice it doesn't
>> work well when your us
In article ,
Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 18.11.2015 um 16:47 schrieb Barry Margolin:
> > In article ,
> > Reindl Harald wrote:
> >
> >> when a result looks like below it needs to be fixed and "Are there any
> >> BIND specific workarounds?" is the wrong question becaus even if - the
> >> domain
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 10:47 -0500, Barry Margolin wrote:
> While that's the pedantically correct answer, in practice it doesn't
> work well when your users complain "Google DNS deals with it, why
> don't you?" Your users don't care what happens to peop
On 11/18/15, 10:47 AM, "bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org on behalf of
Barry Margolin" wrote:
>In article ,
> Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> when a result looks like below it needs to be fixed and "Are there any
>> BIND specific workarounds?" is the wrong question becaus even if - the
>> domain owner
Am 18.11.2015 um 16:47 schrieb Barry Margolin:
In article ,
Reindl Harald wrote:
when a result looks like below it needs to be fixed and "Are there any
BIND specific workarounds?" is the wrong question becaus even if - the
domain owner is not in the position to place workarounds somewhere
In article ,
Reindl Harald wrote:
> when a result looks like below it needs to be fixed and "Are there any
> BIND specific workarounds?" is the wrong question becaus even if - the
> domain owner is not in the position to place workarounds somewhere else
While that's the pedantically correct a
Am 18.11.2015 um 12:34 schrieb Mark Andrews:
In message <5b818b25da9e40ebbff0e3d6dfec1...@pvsvrexc06.ad.tmres.my>, Elias Ahm
ed Kamal writes:
Even with a broken delegation its like always resolvable with Google DNS or=
even Open DNS. Are there any BIND specific workarounds?
The other name
: bind-users@lists.isc.org
> Subject: Re: Query on ignoring additional section returned in replies
>
>
> In message <659dec986e9347369634488991f6e...@pvsvrexc06.ad.tmres.my>, Elias=
> Ahm ed Kamal writes:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I'm having issues resolving
Is this hosted on some sort of load-balancer?
Add a +norecurse to your dig and see how that changes things.
Regards,
Bob
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-use
Subject: Re: Query on ignoring additional section returned in replies
In message <659dec986e9347369634488991f6e...@pvsvrexc06.ad.tmres.my>, Elias Ahm
ed Kamal writes:
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm having issues resolving www.fis.com.my. I'm trying to tell
> fis.com.my tha t it
In message <659dec986e9347369634488991f6e...@pvsvrexc06.ad.tmres.my>, Elias Ahm
ed Kamal writes:
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm having issues resolving www.fis.com.my. I'm trying to tell fis.com.my tha
> t its an issue at their end, but when checking against 8.8.8.8 it resolves fi
> neso it MUST be a pro
11 matches
Mail list logo
