-Steve
-Original Message-
From: Ondrej Sur�
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2020 9:37 AM
To: Steve Farr
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: Slow recursive query performance on Windows x64
The problem is that apparently[*] the machines in your network have default
IPv6 routes, but you don
g on v6 that it shouldn't be doing. So, server ::/0 { bogus yes;
> }; is still the fix... at least on Windows, anyway. Many thanks again to all
> of you for the insightful responses.
>
> -Steve
>
> -Original Message-
> From: bind-users On Behalf Of Mark Andrews
> Sent
ers On Behalf Of Mark Andrews
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2020 1:45 AM
To: Lee
Cc: Ondrej Sury
Subject: Re: Slow recursive query performance on Windows x64
Devices should return ICMP unreachables when networks are not reachable. This
allows applications to move onto the next address. Not r
Devices should return ICMP unreachables when networks are not reachable. This
allows applications to move onto the next address. Not returning unreachables
results in timeouts being the mechanism to move to the next address.
Additionally applications can make parallel connection attempts. This
On 1/20/20, Ondřej Surý wrote:
>
> Please note that filter--on-v4 was always wrong.
how so?
> You should fix your network instead. It’s a bandaid, not a fix.
My ISP doesn't offer ipv6, so I'm not sure how to fix my network..
unless you mean disable ipv6 on everything? (which I'm not sure
Run named with -4 option, that will disable IPv6.
Please note that filter--on-v4 was always wrong. You should fix your
network instead. It’s a bandaid, not a fix.
Ondrej
--
Ondřej Surý — ISC
> On 20 Jan 2020, at 04:38, Carl Byington via bind-users
> wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Sun, 2020-01-19 at 21:54 -0500, Steve Farr via bind-users wrote:
> Does anyone know of a functionality that replaced the now-obsolete
> filter--on-v4?
plugin query "filter-.so" {
filter--on-v4 yes;
};
-BEGIN PGP
how did you do the packet capture - as in, is it
possible you didn't capture everything to/from the server?
Lee
>
> From: Ondrej Sur
> Sent: Friday, January 17, 2020 3:27 PM
> To: Steve Farr
> Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
> Subject: Re: Slow recursive query performance on Windows x6
how did you do the packet capture - as in, is
it possible you didn't capture everything to/from the server?
Lee
>
> From: Ondrej Surý
> Sent: Friday, January 17, 2020 3:27 PM
> To: Steve Farr
> Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
> Subject: Re: Slow recursive query performance on Window
, January 17, 2020 3:27 PM
To: Steve Farr
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: Slow recursive query performance on Windows x64
Hi Steve,
I would suggest to either bump debugging level in bind9 or use wireshark to
look what’s happening on the wire. My best guest is broken IPv6 connectivity
Hi Steve,
I would suggest to either bump debugging level in bind9 or use wireshark to
look what’s happening on the wire. My best guest is broken IPv6 connectivity,
but it could be something completely different. Looking at the packets is a
easiest way to get better understanding of the
11 matches
Mail list logo
