On 2013-07-05 07:21, John Wobus wrote:
I endorse this suggestion: we were faced with such attacks and were
naturally leery about issues we might run into running a patched bind
and the additional tuning it could require. Our experience is: the RRL
patch, used with its default parameters, simply
From: Dave Warren da...@hireahit.com
I haven't been following the RRL discussions too closely, is this patch
scheduled to be included in BIND9 proper or will it remain a patch?
} From: Evan Hunt each at isc.org
} It's not built into bind (yet).
}
} Correct. For the record, it'll be in
2 matches
Mail list logo
