Re: DNSSEC HW Support

I'd like to get your feedback on the following thoughts regarding DNSSEC HW support. Any layer 2 or 3 devices forwarding frames or packets should not be affected by the implementation of DNSSEC regardless of the type of protocol (TCP/UDP) or the query size (large or small). Layer 4 devices

Re: DNSSEC HW Support

I'd like to get your feedback on the following thoughts regarding DNSSEC HW support. Any layer 2 or 3 devices forwarding frames or packets should not be affected by the implementation of DNSSEC regardless of the type of protocol (TCP/UDP) or the query size (large or small). Layer 4

Re: DNSSEC HW Support

On 2010-03-16 15:57, prock...@yahoo.com wrote: I'm trying to figure out how many tests I need to run for an individual product (layer 2, 3, 4, and 7) before I can say it is completely DNSSEC compliant. By definition, any layer 2, 3 and 4 product is DNSSEC-agnostic: DNS with or without

Re: DNSSEC HW Support

On Mar 16, 2010, at 11:39 AM, Niobos wrote: On 2010-03-16 15:57, prock...@yahoo.com wrote: I'm trying to figure out how many tests I need to run for an individual product (layer 2, 3, 4, and 7) before I can say it is completely DNSSEC compliant. By definition, any layer 2, 3 and 4 product is