In message <22408832-7b45-c1dc-870d-c16fb8cb9...@gmail.com>, Sachin Garg writes:
>
> On Thursday 15 June 2017 01:06 PM, wbr...@e1b.org wrote:
> > Mark Andrews wrote on 06/15/2017 12:02:37 AM:
> >
> >> Other ISP's should try to match Google's level of IPv6 commitment.
> They don't seem to be showi
In message ,
wbr...@e1b.org writes:
> Mark Andrews wrote on 06/15/2017 12:02:37 AM:
>
> > Other ISP's should try to match Google's level of IPv6 commitment.
>
> I'll be they would if they had Google's level of cash flow.
Most ISP's already have hardware that supports IPv6. Its in the
software
On Thursday 15 June 2017 01:06 PM, wbr...@e1b.org wrote:
> Mark Andrews wrote on 06/15/2017 12:02:37 AM:
>
>> Other ISP's should try to match Google's level of IPv6 commitment.
They don't seem to be showing too much commitment when it comes to
DHCPv6 support on Android.
Android issue tracker "Su
Mark Andrews wrote on 06/15/2017 12:02:37 AM:
> Other ISP's should try to match Google's level of IPv6 commitment.
I'll be they would if they had Google's level of cash flow.
Confidentiality Notice:
This electronic message and any attachments may contain confidential or
privileged informatio
In message <3ffd4a84-2b7c-78a1-0e35-e741c6d98...@gmail.com>, Sachin Garg writes:
>
> On the point of customers not getting IPv6 (last point below) please see
> this issue for android opened 5 (!) years ago:
>
> Support for DHCPv6 (RFC 3315)
> https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/36949085
>
>
On the point of customers not getting IPv6 (last point below) please see
this issue for android opened 5 (!) years ago:
Support for DHCPv6 (RFC 3315)
https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/36949085
So, when a corp like Google also takes such a pathetic position, what
can one say about ISPs?
On
In message <5856c2c2-6049-2556-7f0a-7d391377c...@acm.org>, Timothe Litt writes:
>
> On the original topic, it would be nice to have a dig option that
> returned both A and with one command.
>
> Since it does this, I tend to use 'host' (note that host -v gives the
> same response detail as d
On the original topic, it would be nice to have a dig option that
returned both A and with one command.
Since it does this, I tend to use 'host' (note that host -v gives the
same response detail as dig -t A ; dig -t ; and dig -t MX).
On the other remarks, inline.
On 14-Jun-17 21:09, Mar
In message <20170614132510.6ff832a5@ime1.iment.local>, Paul Kosinski writes:
> Has IPv4 faded away and I didn't notice? Unlike the well planned switch
> to Area Codes, IPv6 is not backward compatible.
It has started to fade away. If you have IPv6 at home, statistically,
most of your traffic will
Has IPv4 faded away and I didn't notice? Unlike the well planned switch
to Area Codes, IPv6 is not backward compatible.
(The telcos would have gotten rather a lot of complaints if they said
every had to get a new telephone number, and also -- new telephones.)
On Wed, 14 Jun 2017 22:10:25 +1000
M
In message , "Marco Davids
(SIDN)" writes:
> Hi,
>
> Not sure if this has been proposed before, but I am wondering:
>
> Has ISC ever considered to change the default 'dig -t' option from A to
> ?
>
> --
> Marco
This would break too many scripts. You can do this for yourself
by setting the t
On 2017-06-14 10:45:30 +, Marco Davids (SIDN) said:
Hi,
Not sure if this has been proposed before, but I am wondering:
Has ISC ever considered to change the default 'dig -t' option from A to ?
Or a -H option to do both A and queries in a kind of Happy Eyeballs mode?
(Yes, I kno
12 matches
Mail list logo
