On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 5:58 PM, Mik J wrote:
> Thank you Bob for your answer.
> I continued to search and saw rfc1912 page 4
> It's much higher than I first thought
>
>
>
> Le mercredi 3 janvier 2018 à 20:05:57 UTC+1, Bob Harold <
> rharo...@umich.edu> a écrit :
>
>
>
> On
Thank you Bob for your answer.I continued to search and saw rfc1912 page 4It's
much higher than I first thought
Le mercredi 3 janvier 2018 à 20:05:57 UTC+1, Bob Harold
a écrit :
On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 1:57 PM, Mik J via bind-users
On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 1:57 PM, Mik J via bind-users <
bind-users@lists.isc.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to have your thoughts about what should be the best values
> for refresh, retry, expire and negative cache.
>
> In my case I have 2 DNS which are hosted in 2 different locations.
Hello,
I would like to have your thoughts about what should be the best values for
refresh, retry, expire and negative cache.
In my case I have 2 DNS which are hosted in 2 different locations. These
location are near one another (100km). The latency is very low and packet is
0.I configured a
4 matches
Mail list logo