Re: Recommended values for a zone

2018-01-04 Thread Bob Harold
On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 5:58 PM, Mik J wrote: > Thank you Bob for your answer. > I continued to search and saw rfc1912 page 4 > It's much higher than I first thought > > > > Le mercredi 3 janvier 2018 à 20:05:57 UTC+1, Bob Harold < > rharo...@umich.edu> a écrit : > > > > On

Re: Recommended values for a zone

2018-01-03 Thread Mik J via bind-users
Thank you Bob for your answer.I continued to search and saw rfc1912 page 4It's much higher than I first thought Le mercredi 3 janvier 2018 à 20:05:57 UTC+1, Bob Harold a écrit : On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 1:57 PM, Mik J via bind-users

Re: Recommended values for a zone

2018-01-03 Thread Bob Harold
On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 1:57 PM, Mik J via bind-users < bind-users@lists.isc.org> wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to have your thoughts about what should be the best values > for refresh, retry, expire and negative cache. > > In my case I have 2 DNS which are hosted in 2 different locations.

Recommended values for a zone

2018-01-03 Thread Mik J via bind-users
Hello, I would like to have your thoughts about what should be the best values for refresh, retry, expire and negative cache. In my case I have 2 DNS which are hosted in 2 different locations. These location are near one another (100km). The latency is very low and packet is 0.I configured a