On 4/4/2010 2:24 PM, Sten Carlsen wrote:
On 04/04/10 17:41, Kevin Darcy wrote:
On 4/1/2010 9:19 PM, Barry Margolin wrote:
In articlemailman.1048.1270148466.21153.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Kevin Darcyk...@chrysler.com wrote:
Re-use of source ports for DNS queries is a bad security
On 4/4/2010 3:33 PM, Barry Margolin wrote:
In articlemailman.1058.1270395730.21153.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Kevin Darcyk...@chrysler.com wrote:
On 4/1/2010 9:19 PM, Barry Margolin wrote:
In articlemailman.1048.1270148466.21153.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Kevin
In article mailman.1074.1270505464.21153.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Kevin Darcy k...@chrysler.com wrote:
On 4/4/2010 3:33 PM, Barry Margolin wrote:
In articlemailman.1058.1270395730.21153.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Kevin Darcyk...@chrysler.com wrote:
On 4/1/2010 9:19 PM, Barry
On 4/1/2010 9:19 PM, Barry Margolin wrote:
In articlemailman.1048.1270148466.21153.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Kevin Darcyk...@chrysler.com wrote:
Re-use of source ports for DNS queries is a bad security practice. I
cast my vote in favor of penalizing it, in the default configuration of
On 04/04/10 17:41, Kevin Darcy wrote:
On 4/1/2010 9:19 PM, Barry Margolin wrote:
In articlemailman.1048.1270148466.21153.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Kevin Darcyk...@chrysler.com wrote:
Re-use of source ports for DNS queries is a bad security practice. I
cast my vote in favor of
In message 4bb8b33b.4070...@chrysler.com, Kevin Darcy writes:
On 4/1/2010 9:19 PM, Barry Margolin wrote:
In articlemailman.1048.1270148466.21153.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Kevin Darcyk...@chrysler.com wrote:
Re-use of source ports for DNS queries is a bad security practice. I
On 4/1/2010 12:37 AM, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message4bb1c63b.30...@ies.etisalat.ae, Abdulla Bushlaibi writes:
We are facing query drops by using dnsperf tool from ISC testing the DNS
service via load balancer. Multiple queries from the same source port
are being dropped partially by the
On 3/30/2010 5:36 AM, Abdulla Bushlaibi wrote:
We are facing query drops by using dnsperf tool from ISC testing the
DNS service via load balancer. Multiple queries from the same source
port are being dropped partially by the load balancer and as per the
load balancer vendor feed back, this is
In message 4bb4ed5a.20...@chrysler.com, Kevin Darcy writes:
On 4/1/2010 12:37 AM, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message4bb1c63b.30...@ies.etisalat.ae, Abdulla Bushlaibi writes:
We are facing query drops by using dnsperf tool from ISC testing the DNS
service via load balancer. Multiple
In article mailman.1048.1270148466.21153.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Kevin Darcy k...@chrysler.com wrote:
Re-use of source ports for DNS queries is a bad security practice. I
cast my vote in favor of penalizing it, in the default configuration of
any device that responds to DNS requests.
The tool queryperf is a useful tool and it gives you details about a DNS
server performance. However, it would be useful to have an option in
queryperf to use random source ports to test real life scenarios.
--
Abdulla Ahmad Bushlaibi
On 3/31/2010 12:07 AM, Kevin Darcy wrote:
On 3/30/2010
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010, Abdulla Bushlaibi wrote:
We are facing query drops by using dnsperf tool from ISC testing the DNS
service via load balancer. Multiple queries from the same source port are
being dropped partially by the load balancer and as per the load balancer
vendor feed back, this is
On 3/30/2010 8:00 AM, Tony Finch wrote:
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010, Abdulla Bushlaibi wrote:
We are facing query drops by using dnsperf tool from ISC testing the DNS
service via load balancer. Multiple queries from the same source port are
being dropped partially by the load balancer and as per
13 matches
Mail list logo
