Mark Andrews wrote:
> In message <497cae4b.4020...@dougbarton.us>, Doug Barton writes:
>> Joe Baptista wrote:
>>> So a little more testing using firefox as an application gives us some
>>> interesting results. Using the .TM TLD I entered http://tm/ into my
>>> browsers. It did not work. Firefox
In message <497cae4b.4020...@dougbarton.us>, Doug Barton writes:
> Joe Baptista wrote:
> > So a little more testing using firefox as an application gives us some
> > interesting results. Using the .TM TLD I entered http://tm/ into my
> > browsers. It did not work. Firefox replaced http://tm/ wi
Joe Baptista wrote:
> So a little more testing using firefox as an application gives us some
> interesting results. Using the .TM TLD I entered http://tm/ into my
> browsers. It did not work. Firefox replaced http://tm/ with
> http://www.tm.com/ - which is not the web site I wanted to reach.
In
...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Chris Thompson
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 11:56 AM
To: Bind Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: Unified Root - Domain Configuration Issue
On Jan 19 2009, Joe Baptista wrote:
>So a little more testing using firefox as an application gives us some
>interesting r
On Jan 19 2009, Joe Baptista wrote:
So a little more testing using firefox as an application gives us some
interesting results. Using the .TM TLD I entered http://tm/ into my
browsers. It did not work. Firefox replaced http://tm/ with
http://www.tm.com/ - which is not the web site I wanted to
So a little more testing using firefox as an application gives us some
interesting results. Using the .TM TLD I entered http://tm/ into my
browsers. It did not work. Firefox replaced http://tm/ with
http://www.tm.com/ - which is not the web site I wanted to reach.
However - if we qualify the TL
Well - like I said below - it is not recommended to simply use http://tld/ -
however there are a few IANA TLDs that in fact are setup with A records
associated with TLDs. Just did a test out of curiosity and found the
following ccTLDs with A records.
AC. 86400 IN A 193.223.78.210
AF. 86400 IN
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 9:39 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
>
> http://tld and u...@tld can *never* work *reliably* as they
>would cause namespace clashes. Single label represent local
>names not global names.
Thats incorrect. It does work but is not recommended because it
In message <496fb92d.5050...@peter-dambier.de>, Peter Dambier writes:
> Hi ozgurs,
>
> can you give me your address so I can settup a zone for you?
>
> e.g.
>
> ozgursA 127.0.0.1
>
> Then you have the proof that it is working.
http://tld and u...@tld can *never* work *re
Hi ozgurs,
can you give me your address so I can settup a zone for you?
e.g.
ozgurs A 127.0.0.1
Then you have the proof that it is working.
Please have a look at
http://www.cesidianroot.net/
to find how to settup your DNS for the test.
If you have a dynamic ip address things are a li
Unifiedroot is a scam. I suggest you do some due diligence on them before
you pay them any money. Let them know I gave you this heads up - I'm sure
they will appreciate it.
cheers
joe baptista
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 5:48 AM, ozgurs wrote:
> We want to buy a unified root domain,
> but they sa
We want to buy a unified root domain,
but they say we can not use the domain only one word.
like
ozgurs
so that it opens
http://ozgurs
but we have to use a connected word to this TLD, like
example.ozgurs
here, my quetion comes! :)
i bet with my friend that we can not use the domain itself.
NOW
12 matches
Mail list logo
