dear ShanyiWan,
add
#include <sys/capability.h> /* Required for Linux
capabilities */
to ./bind-9.9.4/bin/named/unix/os.c
and it will do (as it does with me).
Regards,
Harald
On 23.09.2013 14:00, bind-users-requ...@lists.isc.org wrote:
Send bind-users mailing list submissions to
bind-users@lists.isc.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
bind-users-requ...@lists.isc.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
bind-users-ow...@lists.isc.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of bind-users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. BIND 9.9.4 compile error (ShanyiWan)
2. Re: RRL probably not useful for DNS IP blacklists, was Re:
New Versions of BIND are available (9.9.4, 9.8.6, and
9.6-ESV-R10) (Eliezer Croitoru)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 12:03:54 +0800
From: ShanyiWan <w...@114.com.cn>
To: bind-users <bind-users@lists.isc.org>
Subject: BIND 9.9.4 compile error
Message-ID: <201309231203540070...@114.com.cn>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
[root@localhost bind-9.9.4]# uname -a
Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.18-274.el5PAE #1 SMP Fri Jul 22 05:34:36 EDT
2011 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
[root@localhost bind-9.9.4]# lsb_release -a
LSB Version:
:core-4.0-ia32:core-4.0-noarch:graphics-4.0-ia32:graphics-4.0-noarch:printing-4.0-ia32:printing-4.0-noarch
Distributor ID: CentOS
Description: CentOS release 5.9 (Final)
Release: 5.9
Codename: Final
# ./configure --enable-threads --enable-rrl
--with-dlz-bdb=/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.5.1/
cofigure is ok.
# make
...
ranlib liblwres.a
touch timestamp
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/bind-9.9.4/lib/lwres'
making all in /usr/local/src/bind-9.9.4/lib/tests
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/bind-9.9.4/lib/tests'
making all in /usr/local/src/bind-9.9.4/lib/tests/include
make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/bind-9.9.4/lib/tests/include'
making all in /usr/local/src/bind-9.9.4/lib/tests/include/tests
make[4]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/bind-9.9.4/lib/tests/include/tests'
make[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/bind-9.9.4/lib/tests/include/tests'
make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/bind-9.9.4/lib/tests/include'
gcc -I/usr/local/src/bind-9.9.4 -I/usr/local/src/bind-9.9.4/lib/dns/include
-I../../lib/dns/include -I/usr/local/src/bind-9.9.4/lib/isc/include
-I../../lib/isc -I../../lib/isc/include -I../../lib/isc/unix/include
-I../../lib/isc/pthreads/include -I../../lib/isc/x86_32/include
-I../../lib/tests/include -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE -g -O2
-I/usr/include/libxml2 -W -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wcast-qual
-Wwrite-strings -Wformat -Wpointer-arith -fno-strict-aliasing -c t_api.c
/usr/bin/ar cruv libt_api.a t_api.o
a - t_api.o
ranlib libt_api.a
touch timestamp
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/bind-9.9.4/lib/tests'
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/bind-9.9.4/lib'
making all in /usr/local/src/bind-9.9.4/bin
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/bind-9.9.4/bin'
making all in /usr/local/src/bind-9.9.4/bin/named
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/bind-9.9.4/bin/named'
making all in /usr/local/src/bind-9.9.4/bin/named/unix
make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/bind-9.9.4/bin/named/unix'
gcc -I/usr/local/src/bind-9.9.4 -I./include -I./../include
-I/usr/local/src/bind-9.9.4/lib/isccfg/include -I../../../lib/isccfg/include
-I/usr/local/src/bind-9.9.4/lib/isccc/include -I../../../lib/isccc/include
-I/usr/local/src/bind-9.9.4/lib/dns/include -I../../../lib/dns/include
-I/usr/local/src/bind-9.9.4/lib/isc/include -I../../../lib/isc
-I../../../lib/isc/include -I../../../lib/isc/unix/include
-I../../../lib/isc/pthreads/include -I../../../lib/isc/x86_32/include
-D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE -g -O2 -I/usr/include/libxml2 -W -Wall
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings -Wformat -Wpointer-arith
-fno-strict-aliasing -c os.c
os.c:166: error: expected ?)? before ?caps?
os.c: In function ?linux_initialprivs?:
os.c:242: error: ?cap_t? undeclared (first use in this function)
os.c:242: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
os.c:242: error: for each function it appears in.)
os.c:242: error: expected ?;? before ?caps?
os.c:244: error: expected ?;? before ?curcaps?
os.c:245: error: ?cap_value_t? undeclared (first use in this function)
os.c:245: error: expected ?;? before ?capval?
os.c:255: error: ?caps? undeclared (first use in this function)
os.c:255: warning: implicit declaration of function ?cap_init?
os.c:255: error: ?curcaps? undeclared (first use in this function)
os.c:255: warning: implicit declaration of function ?cap_get_proc?
os.c:260: error: ?capval? undeclared (first use in this function)
os.c:260: error: ?cap_flag_value_t? undeclared (first use in this function)
os.c:260: error: expected ?;? before ?curval?
os.c:260: warning: implicit declaration of function ?cap_get_flag?
os.c:260: error: ?CAP_PERMITTED? undeclared (first use in this function)
os.c:260: error: ?curval? undeclared (first use in this function)
os.c:260: warning: implicit declaration of function ?cap_set_flag?
os.c:260: error: ?CAP_EFFECTIVE? undeclared (first use in this function)
os.c:260: error: ?CAP_SET? undeclared (first use in this function)
os.c:265: error: expected ?;? before ?curval?
os.c:274: error: expected ?;? before ?curval?
os.c:280: error: expected ?;? before ?curval?
os.c:286: error: expected ?;? before ?curval?
os.c:295: error: expected ?;? before ?curval?
os.c:301: error: expected ?;? before ?curval?
os.c:303: warning: implicit declaration of function ?linux_setcaps?
os.c:306: warning: implicit declaration of function ?cap_free?
os.c: In function ?linux_minprivs?:
os.c:312: error: ?cap_t? undeclared (first use in this function)
os.c:312: error: expected ?;? before ?caps?
os.c:314: error: expected ?;? before ?curcaps?
os.c:315: error: ?cap_value_t? undeclared (first use in this function)
os.c:315: error: expected ?;? before ?capval?
os.c:320: error: ?caps? undeclared (first use in this function)
os.c:320: error: ?curcaps? undeclared (first use in this function)
os.c:329: error: ?capval? undeclared (first use in this function)
os.c:329: error: ?cap_flag_value_t? undeclared (first use in this function)
os.c:329: error: expected ?;? before ?curval?
os.c:329: error: ?CAP_PERMITTED? undeclared (first use in this function)
os.c:329: error: ?curval? undeclared (first use in this function)
os.c:329: error: ?CAP_EFFECTIVE? undeclared (first use in this function)
os.c:329: error: ?CAP_SET? undeclared (first use in this function)
os.c:338: error: expected ?;? before ?curval?
make[3]: *** [os.o] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/bind-9.9.4/bin/named/unix'
make[2]: *** [subdirs] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/bind-9.9.4/bin/named'
make[1]: *** [subdirs] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/bind-9.9.4/bin'
make: *** [subdirs] Error 1
ShanyiWan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20130923/ee963e55/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 09:40:05 +0300
From: Eliezer Croitoru <elie...@ngtech.co.il>
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: RRL probably not useful for DNS IP blacklists, was Re:
New Versions of BIND are available (9.9.4, 9.8.6, and 9.6-ESV-R10)
Message-ID: <523fe245.6000...@ngtech.co.il>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On 09/20/2013 05:12 PM, Vernon Schryver wrote:
The potential RRL problem is when you provide high volume DNSBL service
over the open Internet to DNS clients that are not authenticated.
However, that is unlikely to be a worry, because providing DNSBL
services over the open Internet is dubious idea for unrelated reasons.
Major DNSBL providers have years since limited anonymous clients for
business or other reasons. For example, I think Spamhaus limits
anonymous clients to fewer than 3 queries/second.
and I doubt they use RRL in the application level..
I assume they limit that on either IPTABLES\FW level.
What is the way to provide DBSBL using bind??
I was looking for something like that but I am sure a dynamic DB is
needed for the task right?
Eliezer
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
End of bind-users Digest, Vol 1633, Issue 1
*******************************************
--
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)
ATIS - IT Infrastruture and Services, Faculty of Computer Science
Harald A. Irmer
IT Manager / Computer Networks Group
Am Fasanengarten 5
Building 50.34
76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
Phone: +49 721 608-46963
Fax: +49 721 608-46699
Email: harald.ir...@kit.edu
http://www.kit.edu/
KIT University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and
National Laboratory of the Helmholtz Association
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
