On Sat, 2011-01-29 at 14:49 +0800, p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote:
The book Pro DNS and BIND says:
If the caching server obtains its data directly from an authoritative DNS,
then it too will respond as authoritative. Ohterwise, if the data is
supplied from its cache, the response is
That is no longer the case. It doesn't respond authoritative on the first
query.
-Ben Croswell
On Jan 30, 2011 10:01 AM, Kevin Oberman ober...@es.net wrote:
On Sat, 2011-01-29 at 14:49 +0800, p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote:
The book Pro DNS and BIND says:
If the caching server obtains its data
No, BIND 8 was broken this was also. This was fixed in BIND 9. As for
non-BIND name servers, anything goes.
Chris Buxton
BlueCat Networks
On 1/29/11, Barry Margolin bar...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
In article mailman.1566.1296284011.555.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote:
The
In message aanlktinnokvhtux8f9-dfgcl2lkzjfe+wmb_xxk0r...@mail.gmail.com,
Chris Buxton writes:
No, BIND 8 was broken this was also. This was fixed in BIND 9. As for
non-BIND name servers, anything goes.
Chris Buxton
BlueCat Networks
It depended on the BIND 8 version. Running everything
In article mailman.1566.1296284011.555.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote:
The book Pro DNS and BIND says:
If the caching server obtains its data directly from an authoritative DNS,
then it too will respond as authoritative. Ohterwise, if the data is
supplied from its
The book Pro DNS and BIND says:
If the caching server obtains its data directly from an authoritative DNS,
then it too will respond as authoritative. Ohterwise, if the data is
supplied from its cache, the response is nonauthoritative.
So this means even for a cache only server it can answer
6 matches
Mail list logo