Evan Hunt writes:
> On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 09:46:16PM -0500, Grant Taylor wrote: > I
> think I saw a tweet with a figure around $185,000 US Dollars. > > I
> wonder if that is on the low side.
>
> I believe that's the fee to apply, per domain. Proof of ability to
> provision and run a re
On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 09:46:16PM -0500, Grant Taylor wrote:
> I think I saw a tweet with a figure around $185,000 US Dollars.
>
> I wonder if that is on the low side.
I believe that's the fee to apply, per domain. Proof of ability to
provision and run a registry business to ICANN specification
On 04/01/2015 06:57 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
I'm sure it was not cheap.
I think I saw a tweet with a figure around $185,000 US Dollars.
I wonder if that is on the low side.
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/lis
they do that
-Original Message-
From: Reindl Harald
Organization: the lounge interactive design
Date: Wednesday, April 1, 2015 at 2:44 PM
To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org"
Subject: Re: com.google how did they do that
>Am 01.04.2015 um 20:42 schrieb Thomas Schulz:
>> As
.ibm, .cisco, .apple, .google, .sucks, .melbourne and many hundreds of others
have been applied for and hundreds already delegated into the root. '.hp' was
deemed too short (must be at least 3 characters).
See https://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus for the
new TLD's
-Original Message-
From: Reindl Harald
Organization: the lounge interactive design
Date: Wednesday, April 1, 2015 at 2:44 PM
To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org"
Subject: Re: com.google how did they do that
>Am 01.04.2015 um 20:42 schrieb Thomas Schulz:
>> As of the tim
In article ,
Jan-Piet Mens wrote:
> > I'm sure it was not cheap.
>
> Peanuts compared to their buying .app for $25m. [1] Here's a list of the
> other TLDs they've got so far: [2]
Some of them sound like more April Fools jokes.
>
> > Brace yourself! There are many here now, and more coming.
> I'm sure it was not cheap.
Peanuts compared to their buying .app for $25m. [1] Here's a list of the
other TLDs they've got so far: [2]
> Brace yourself! There are many here now, and more coming.
The list of delegated strings [3] increases almost daily, yes. (And I
can't stop laughing.)
On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 02:42:04PM -0400, Thomas Schulz wrote:
> As of the time I am sending this, you can point your browser
> to http://com.google and get a web page. How did they get
> com.google to resolve?
I'm sure it was not cheap.
Brace yourself! There are many here now, and more coming.
Am 01.04.2015 um 20:42 schrieb Thomas Schulz:
As of the time I am sending this, you can point your browser to
http://com.google and get a web page. How did they get com.google
to resolve?
.google is just another new TLD
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
As of the time I am sending this, you can point your browser to
http://com.google and get a web page. How did they get com.google
to resolve?
Tom Schulz
Applied Dynamics Intl.
sch...@adi.com
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-us
11 matches
Mail list logo