Hi Gordon,
We've not seen this before (and it doesn't sound like anyone else has
either). What version of BIND is it? Has it reappeared since? Is this
a particularly heavily loaded/busy server? Does it have recursive cache
as well as authoritative zones?
Kind regards,
Cathy
Gordon A. Lang
Almond cat...@isc.org
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 6:52 AM
Subject: Re: discrepancy with rndc dumpdb -zones
Hi Gordon,
We've not seen this before (and it doesn't sound like anyone else has
either). What version of BIND is it? Has it reappeared since
On 24.08.10 16:56, Gordon A. Lang wrote:
After several successful update delete ... nsupdate sends to the master
DNS server, verified with dig, the rndc dumpdb -zones command produced
named_dump.db file still showing the deleted records. This was repeatable
and persistent (over the half hour
After several successful update delete ... nsupdate sends to the master
DNS server, verified with dig, the rndc dumpdb -zones command produced
named_dump.db file still showing the deleted records. This was repeatable
and persistent (over the half hour time period) until I performed a hard
4 matches
Mail list logo