So, let me see if I have this correctly: you think that DNS architects
and/or planners should constrain their choices with respect to namespace
layout and/or delegation hierarchy, because of some minor performance
considerations, based on your _speculations_ (without any hard evidence)
about
In article mailman.1600.1296530179.555.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote:
given the domain name of 126.com, and given an A RR in its zone is:
s1.s2.s3 IN A 11.22.33.44
OK when a dns cache query for s1.s2.s3.126.com the first time, it will
follow the logic:
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 11:11:47AM +0800, p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote:
...
So I dont think dotted hostname is good pratical.
...
You need to read the whole posting. Another poster pointed out that the
dot _ I S _ the DNS delimiter.
--
given the domain name of 126.com, and given an A RR in its zone is:
s1.s2.s3 IN A 11.22.33.44
OK when a dns cache query for s1.s2.s3.126.com the first time, it will
follow the logic:
#1, s1.s2.s3.126.com has NS RR in cache? (no)
#2, s2.s3.126.com has NS RR in cache? (no)
#3,
4 matches
Mail list logo
