You'll want to use max-cache-size to enforce a hard limit on the size
of your cache.
http://www.zytrax.com/books/dns/ch7/hkpng.html#max-cache-size
/Tim
---
Tim Krzywonos
e:: t...@krzywonos.ca
Thanks for reminding me of that. Now that I have some confidence
that the problem is the
Have you tried an rndc flush? You can also dump the contents of the
cache to find the (approximate) size of the cache. If related to cache,
you can tweak parameters to cache, most namely max-cache-size. IIRC,
the cache doesn't have a size limit by default.
/Tim
I did an rndc
You'll want to use max-cache-size to enforce a hard limit on the size
of your cache.
http://www.zytrax.com/books/dns/ch7/hkpng.html#max-cache-size
/Tim
---
Tim Krzywonos
e:: t...@krzywonos.ca
On 2014-07-21 10:57, sch...@adi.com wrote:
Have you tried an rndc flush? You can also dump the
Have you tried an rndc flush? You can also dump the contents of the
cache to find the (approximate) size of the cache. If related to cache,
you can tweak parameters to cache, most namely max-cache-size. IIRC,
the cache doesn't have a size limit by default.
/Tim
I did an rndc dumpdb
We are running Bind on a Sun Sparc machine running Solairs 8. Bind is
built as a 32 bit executable as that is the default and is the way
libcrypto and libxml2 are built. We have been running Bind 9.9.5.
I am now trying Bind 9.9.6b1 as that claims to have fixed some memory
leaks.
For some time now
Have you tried an rndc flush? You can also dump the contents of the
cache to find the (approximate) size of the cache. If related to cache,
you can tweak parameters to cache, most namely max-cache-size. IIRC,
the cache doesn't have a size limit by default.
/Tim
---
Tim Krzywonos
e::
6 matches
Mail list logo