Jim Popovitch wrote:
>
> Hmmm, this is counter to what I've believed all along. I
> thought it was
> prudent to have key overlap during rollovers.
There are two separate things which you can overlap semi-independently:
* is the key published in the zone?
* is the key
On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 05:12:47PM +0100, Tony Finch wrote:
> Jim Popovitch via bind-users wrote:
> >
> > Thanks. Now I'm seeing something slighly different. I have 3 NS
> > servers, ns{1-3}.domainmail.org.
> >
> > When I first asked 3 days ago I was seeing long ANY
Jim Popovitch via bind-users wrote:
>
> Thanks. Now I'm seeing something slighly different. I have 3 NS
> servers, ns{1-3}.domainmail.org.
>
> When I first asked 3 days ago I was seeing long ANY repsonses on the
> master (ns1). Today I am seeing long ANY responses on
On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 09:51:25AM +0100, Tony Finch wrote:
> Jim Popovitch via bind-users wrote:
> >
> > Should minimal-all (v9.11.0-rc1) work on a master? My testing shows
> > that it only works on the slave DNS servers.
>
> Works for me :-) minimal-any is
4 matches
Mail list logo