Re: minimal-any on master

2016-09-05 Thread Tony Finch
Jim Popovitch wrote: > > Hmmm, this is counter to what I've believed all along. I > thought it was > prudent to have key overlap during rollovers. There are two separate things which you can overlap semi-independently: * is the key published in the zone? * is the key

Re: minimal-any on master

2016-09-05 Thread Jim Popovitch via bind-users
On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 05:12:47PM +0100, Tony Finch wrote: > Jim Popovitch via bind-users wrote: > > > > Thanks. Now I'm seeing something slighly different. I have 3 NS > > servers, ns{1-3}.domainmail.org. > > > > When I first asked 3 days ago I was seeing long ANY

Re: minimal-any on master

2016-09-05 Thread Tony Finch
Jim Popovitch via bind-users wrote: > > Thanks. Now I'm seeing something slighly different. I have 3 NS > servers, ns{1-3}.domainmail.org. > > When I first asked 3 days ago I was seeing long ANY repsonses on the > master (ns1). Today I am seeing long ANY responses on

Re: minimal-any on master

2016-09-05 Thread Jim Popovitch via bind-users
On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 09:51:25AM +0100, Tony Finch wrote: > Jim Popovitch via bind-users wrote: > > > > Should minimal-all (v9.11.0-rc1) work on a master? My testing shows > > that it only works on the slave DNS servers. > > Works for me :-) minimal-any is