On 04.03.13 17:35, Shawn Bakhtiar wrote:
A better solution may be (if feasible) to register and get an internet AS
number and enable BGP on both links. If one fails the upstream routers
(even if from desperate providers) will detect a fail and re-rout via the
active link.
you don't need AS
, but that's very
hackish.
Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2013 16:16:28 +0100
From: uh...@fantomas.sk
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: forwarding query-source (was Re: name caching and forwarding)
On 01.03.13 17:23, Lawrence K. Chen, P.Eng. wrote:
I thought I had read somewhere the query-source
On 01.03.13 17:23, Lawrence K. Chen, P.Eng. wrote:
I thought I had read somewhere the query-source default is to try making
queries from all the IPs on my system.
No, the default is to use special IP 0.0.0.0 that causes the system (not
the BIND) to select source IP address.
And, my DNS
This reminds me of a problem that I've been having, that came up again recently.
I thought I had read somewhere the query-source default is to try making
queries from all the IPs on my system. And, my DNS servers have two IPs on
themusing policy based routing, the first IP routes out on my
So now I am working on adding a name caching service to my mailserver.
And I am reading up on namecaching. For RHEL/Centos, there is not much
to doing this as the default install of bind SEEMS to be a name caching
server. But I want it to NOT go out on the net for queries, but to
direct all
On 26/02/13 16:07, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
And I am having challenges with the forward option. It reads that
'forward only' will always ask the forwarder about the query and seems
to defeat caching? And 'forward first' only looks in cache after a
forward fails? This does not sound right and
On 02/26/2013 11:14 AM, Phil Mayers wrote:
On 26/02/13 16:07, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
And I am having challenges with the forward option. It reads that
'forward only' will always ask the forwarder about the query and seems
to defeat caching? And 'forward first' only looks in cache after a
On 2/26/2013 11:39 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 02/26/2013 11:14 AM, Phil Mayers wrote:
On 26/02/13 16:07, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
And I am having challenges with the forward option. It reads that
'forward only' will always ask the forwarder about the query and seems
to defeat caching?
hey, Kevin, hope you are hanging well back at the old stomping ground!
On 02/26/2013 01:42 PM, Kevin Darcy wrote:
On 2/26/2013 11:39 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 02/26/2013 11:14 AM, Phil Mayers wrote:
On 26/02/13 16:07, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
And I am having challenges with the forward
In message 512d0222.5020...@chrysler.com, Kevin Darcy writes:
If all you want to do is run a private namespace, I wouldn't be fiddling
around with forwarding at all. Set up your own root zone, propagate a
private set of hints data, and be happy. I know that you once thrived in
such a DNS
10 matches
Mail list logo
