Mark,
please see below...
On 04.05.2010 / 14:31:25 +1000, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message y2sf7e964441005031927m7774769ev280156817d8b4...@mail.gmail.com,
Je
ff Pang writes:
Hello,
Following the discussions in the list, I made a test on one of our
servers, which is in an ISP's
at 2010-06-22 17:11:44 UTC
169.199.1.1 sent EDNS buffer size 4096
169.199.1.1 DNS reply size limit is at least 3843
--- On Tue, 6/22/10, Anatoly Pugachev ma...@team.co.ru wrote:
From: Anatoly Pugachev ma...@team.co.ru
Subject: Re: our isp not supports EDNS?
To: Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org
Cc
2010/5/4 Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org:
In message y2sf7e964441005031927m7774769ev280156817d8b4...@mail.gmail.com,
Je
ff Pang writes:
Does this mean our ISP's filrewall block EDNS query/response?
Thanks Mark.
Firstly I was very afraid DNSSEC deployment for root DNS will affect
our DNS
Hello,
Following the discussions in the list, I made a test on one of our
servers, which is in an ISP's datacenter.
The result is below:
$ dig +short rs.dns-oarc.net txt
rst.x476.rs.dns-oarc.net.
rst.x485.x476.rs.dns-oarc.net.
rst.x490.x485.x476.rs.dns-oarc.net.
218.204.255.72 DNS reply size
In message y2sf7e964441005031927m7774769ev280156817d8b4...@mail.gmail.com, Je
ff Pang writes:
Hello,
Following the discussions in the list, I made a test on one of our
servers, which is in an ISP's datacenter.
The result is below:
$ dig +short rs.dns-oarc.net txt
5 matches
Mail list logo