They are authoritative nameservers.
Thanks for the reply!
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 16:12:51 -0500
From: lkc...@ksu.edu
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: question about dns query distribution
Are these authoritative nameservers or resolving DNS servers?
If the latter, its probably
of the servers are as similar as suggested here. And both
nameservers have glue records.
Thanks for the feedback!
Marty
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 12:06:36 -0800
Subject: Re: question about dns query distribution
From: ca...@deccio.net
To: sun-g...@live.com
CC: bind-users@lists.isc.org
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013
On 08.02.13 20:01, benjamin fernandis wrote:
We have recursive / caching name server for our Broadband internet
services. And we have 60-40 traffic ratio. I mean 60 % queries comes
on primary and 40% on secondary.
Why primary does not getting 100% ?
Is there any way to do it ? or what is the
HI Lawrence,
We have recursive / caching name server for our Broadband internet
services. And we have 60-40 traffic ratio. I mean 60 % queries comes
on primary and 40% on secondary.
Why primary does not getting 100% ?
Is there any way to do it ? or what is the reason behind it that both
In article mailman.1259.1360341660.11945.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Barry S. Finkel bsfin...@att.net wrote:
HI Lawrence,
We have recursive / caching name server for our Broadband internet
services. And we have 60-40 traffic ratio. I mean 60 % queries comes
on primary and 40% on
Recently noticed that for 2 nameservers ns1.tbd.com and ns2.tbd.com (names are
changed to protect the innocent) the first nameserver consistently receives
twice as many queries as the 2nd nameserver.
Who can tell me why queries are distributed this way?
Any ideas?
I assume it's something
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 11:32 AM, M. Meadows sun-g...@live.com wrote:
Recently noticed that for 2 nameservers ns1.tbd.com and ns2.tbd.com(names are
changed to protect the innocent) the first nameserver
consistently receives twice as many queries as the 2nd nameserver.
Who can tell me why
Are these authoritative nameservers or resolving DNS servers?
If the latter, its probably because everybody has resolv.conf's listing
ns1.tbd.com first and ns2.tbd.com second.
We used to have 3 recursive/caching servers x.x.x.2, x.x.x.3, x.x.x.4.
x.x.x.2 would get heavily used , with the
8 matches
Mail list logo