Once again. Thanks to everyone for the feedback!
Marty
> To: dspa...@gmail.com
> From: ma...@isc.org
> Subject: Re: question about thehartford.com domain
> Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:40:10 +1000
> CC: dnsad...@thehartford.com; ns...@verisign-grs.com; bind-us...@isc.org
>
In message <4dfa62ca.7060...@gmail.com>, David Sparro writes:
> On 6/15/2011 7:41 PM, M. Meadows wrote:
> >
> > The DNS admins at thehartford.com seem to feel that this nameserver
> > mismatch is working as expected.
> >
> > So I'm just wondering if anyone still feels that the nameserver mismatch
neral rule is
when you're migrating from one set of nameservers to another.
- Kevin
From: sun-g...@live.com
To: mich...@rancid.berkeley.edu
Subject: RE: question about thehartford.com domain
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:59:32 -0400
CC: bind-users@lists.isc.org
On 6/15/2011 7:41 PM, M. Meadows wrote:
The DNS admins at thehartford.com seem to feel that this nameserver
mismatch is working as expected.
So I'm just wondering if anyone still feels that the nameserver mismatch
seen with the digs in earlier parts of this email thread may present a
problem to
h the digs in earlier parts of this email thread may present a problem to
servers requesting name resolution for address records in the "thehartford.com"
domain.
Thanks,
Marty
From: sun-g...@live.com
To: mich...@rancid.berkeley.edu
Subject: RE: question about thehartford.com domain
Just wanted to say thanks to everyone for the quick feedback!
We appreciate your assistance on this.
Marty
> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 08:25:00 -0700
> From: mich...@rancid.berkeley.edu
> To: sun-g...@live.com
> CC: bind-users@lists.isc.org
> Subject: Re: question about
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, M. Meadows wrote:
Question : our check of whois indicates that ns1.thehartford.com and
ns2.thehartford.com are
the authoritative nameservers for thehartford.com. A dig with a +trace for
eftc.thehartford.com seems to indicate that they are indeed the auth
nameservers. It?
Info at the authoritative servers doesn't match the glue records.
We see this all the time on our recursive resolvers.
rich-goodsons-computer:~ rgoodson$ dig +norec @ns1.thehartford.com
thehartford.com NS
; <<>> DiG 9.6.0-APPLE-P2 <<>> +norec @ns1.thehartford.com thehartford.com NS
; (1 server
On 6/15/2011 8:28 AM, M. Meadows wrote:
> Question : why does eftc as an address record in the thehartford.com
> zone file have a 30 second TTL? Seems … very … short. I think most
> nameservers won’t do less than a minute for an address record. Right?
No. There is no problem with a short TTL.
>
Good morning.
We sent the following email to the dns managers at thehartford.com this morning:
-
Hi. We’re experiencing some issues with address record lookups for
eftc.thehartford.com. We’ve got a coupl
10 matches
Mail list logo
