On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 8:12 AM, Mukund Sivaraman m...@isc.org wrote:
Hi Len
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 09:52:23AM -0600, lcon...@go2france.com wrote:
binary upgraded Freebsd 10 to Freebsd 10.1
named 9.10.1, compiled from source
at named start, 305 MB memory
after several hours of
To: Mukund Sivaraman
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: still have named memory leak
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 8:12 AM, Mukund Sivaraman m...@isc.org
mailto:m...@isc.org wrote:
Hi Len
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 09:52:23AM -0600, lcon...@go2france.com
mailto:lcon...@go2france.com wrote:
binary
binary upgraded Freebsd 10 to Freebsd 10.1
named 9.10.1, compiled from source
at named start, 305 MB memory
after several hours of running named is approaching 800 MB. I'm sure
after a couple of days, as before, it will head towards 2000 MB
suggestions?
this is a recursive only NS, about
Hi Len
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 09:52:23AM -0600, lcon...@go2france.com wrote:
binary upgraded Freebsd 10 to Freebsd 10.1
named 9.10.1, compiled from source
at named start, 305 MB memory
after several hours of running named is approaching 800 MB. I'm sure after a
couple of days, as
On Friday 12/12/2014 at 10:12 am, Mukund Sivaraman wrote:
Hi Len
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 09:52:23AM -0600, lcon...@go2france.com wrote:
binary upgraded Freebsd 10 to Freebsd 10.1
named 9.10.1, compiled from source
at named start, 305 MB memory
after several hours of running named is
5 matches
Mail list logo