Dnia 2011-02-10 15:49 Walter Smith napisał(a):
Oh - the original thought was to re-shuffle/clean-up zone(s) on
Master...and since Slave(s) has this nice $ORIGIN paragraphs - would be
nice to combine all these unique $ORIGINs back on Master...
I personally find only one $ORIGIN at start of
...
Is there any way to have ONLY ONE paragraph per $ORIGIN?
Thanks folks,
-WS
--- On Wed, 2/9/11, Barry Margolin bar...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
From: Barry Margolin bar...@alum.mit.edu
Subject: Re: syntax/format of zone on slave $ORIGIN/paragraph - sorted?
To: comp-protocols-dns-b...@isc.org
Date
: Torinthiel torinth...@data.pl
Subject: Re: syntax/format of zone on slave $ORIGIN/paragraph - sorted?
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Date: Wednesday, February 9, 2011, 10:50 AM
On 02/09/11 17:34, Walter Smith wrote:
Hello,
I have bind/named running on Linux master and slaves. All is good, but
now
On 2/10/2011 8:40 AM, Walter Smith wrote:
Oh Thanks - I understand that - I can't comprehend the logic behind
composing _same_ $ORIGIN paragraphs over-and-over again - this is an
example [...]
I'd recommend using masterfile-format raw; on the slaves and then you
don't care how BIND takes the
On Feb 10 2011, Barry Margolin wrote:
When writing the zone file on a slave, BIND uses $ORIGIN so that all
records just have a single label. So instead of writing:
foo.bar IN A 1.2.3.4
it will write:
$ORIGIN bar
foo IN A 1.2.3.4
If you have a zone with lots of levels of subdomain, the
wrote:
From: Chris Thompson c...@cam.ac.uk
Subject: Re: syntax/format of zone on slave $ORIGIN/paragraph - sorted?
To: Barry Margolin bar...@alum.mit.edu
Cc: Bind-Users List bind-us...@isc.org
Date: Thursday, February 10, 2011, 9:48 AM
On Feb 10 2011, Barry Margolin wrote:
When writing the zone
Thompson c...@cam.ac.uk wrote:
From: Chris Thompson c...@cam.ac.uk
Subject: Re: syntax/format of zone on slave $ORIGIN/paragraph - sorted?
To: Barry Margolin bar...@alum.mit.edu
Cc: Bind-Users List bind-us...@isc.org
Date: Thursday, February 10, 2011, 9:48 AM
On Feb 10 2011, Barry Margolin
On 2/10/2011 10:11 AM, Walter Smith wrote:
So - I want to combine and sort unique $ORIGINs without seeing same
$ORIGIN again and again.
The question was asked, but I didn't see an answer... What are you doing
with the zones on the slave server that you think is actually safe to do?
Why not
zone within Master/Slave/loopback?
Also - is there any good examples how to use named-compilezone?
--- On Thu, 2/10/11, Alan Clegg acl...@isc.org wrote:
From: Alan Clegg acl...@isc.org
Subject: Re: syntax/format of zone on slave $ORIGIN/paragraph - sorted?
To: bind-us...@isc.org
Date: Thursday
Hello,
I have bind/named running on Linux master and slaves. All is good, but now when
I’m trying to clean up some old records – I realized that sorted zone on slaves
are quite uneven. What I meant is, the $ORIGIN splits the zone into some
unknown to me syntax/format. Is there anywhere I can
On Feb 9 2011, Walter Smith wrote:
I have bind/named running on Linux master and slaves. All is good, but
now when I'm trying to clean up some old records - I realized that sorted
zone on slaves are quite uneven. What I meant is, the $ORIGIN splits the
zone into some unknown to me
On 02/09/11 17:34, Walter Smith wrote:
Hello,
I have bind/named running on Linux master and slaves. All is good, but
now when I’m trying to clean up some old records – I realized that
sorted zone on slaves are quite uneven. What I meant is, the $ORIGIN
splits the zone into some unknown to
In article mailman.43.1297269285.10842.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Walter Smith whatis...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hello,
I have bind/named running on Linux master and slaves. All is good, but now
when Iâm trying to clean up some old records â I realized that sorted
zone on
slaves are quite
13 matches
Mail list logo
