RE: unable-resolve-bank=domain

2023-12-17 Thread MEjaz via bind-users
-banking.gslb.sabbnet.com): ignoring nsec because name is past end of range Ejaz -Original Message- From: MEjaz [mailto:me...@cyberia.net.sa] Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2023 11:16 AM To: 'Ondřej Surý' Cc: 'bind-users@lists.isc.org' Subject: RE: unable-resolve-bank=domain My queries

RE: unable-resolve-bank=domain

2023-12-17 Thread MEjaz via bind-users
, December 17, 2023 11:01 AM To: MEjaz Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: unable-resolve-bank=domain > On 17. 12. 2023, at 8:20, MEjaz via bind-users > wrote: > > Any hint would be highly appreciated.. Paraphrasing: Logs or it didn’t happen… Always start with logs. Th

Re: unable-resolve-bank=domain

2023-12-17 Thread Ondřej Surý
> On 17. 12. 2023, at 8:20, MEjaz via bind-users > wrote: > > Any hint would be highly appreciated.. Paraphrasing: Logs or it didn’t happen… Always start with logs. The dig output is useless as we can’t possibly know what is happening inside named on that server. Ondrej -- Ondřej Surý —

Re: unable-resolve-bank=domain

2023-12-17 Thread Marco Moock
Am 17.12.2023 um 10:21:05 Uhr schrieb MEjaz via bind-users: > One of the banking domain www.services.online-banking.gslb.sabbnet.com > unable to > resolve with our primary namservers 212.119.64.2 whearas as my > another server 212.119.64.3

unable-resolve-bank=domain

2023-12-16 Thread MEjaz via bind-users
Hi all. One of the banking domain www.services.online-banking.gslb.sabbnet.com unable to resolve with our primary namservers 212.119.64.2 whearas as my another server 212.119.64.3 is ok In addition to that when I dig with