BIND 9.3.5-P2 download link required

Dear Team We need BIND 9.3.5-P2 version. But we are not getting the Download link.Kindly provide me the link. so that we can download this version,. Thanks regds Abhilash This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain

Re: socket: too many open file descriptors

On 3 dic, 21:08, Mark Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], pollex writes: Hi Jinmei I have followed your advice and I have installed and compiled the Bind 9.3.6 with the following command: STD_CDEFINES=-ISC_SOCKET_FDSETSIZE=4096 ./configure --prefix=/usr/

RE: How to modify A records on the slave when master is down?

Huh? sftp uses secure transport as does scp and both use the same keys as ssh. I can see no way in which ftps would be viewed as superior. Exactly how are you losing RSA keys and if you do aren't you more concerned that you can no longer ssh into the box?

BIND 9.5.1rc1 is now available.

BIND 9.5.1rc1 is now available. BIND 9.5.1rc1 is a maintenance release candidate for BIND 9.5. BIND 9.5.1rc1 can be downloaded from ftp://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind9/9.5.1rc1/bind-9.5.1rc1.tar.gz The PGP signature of the distribution is at

how to archieve this?

Hello, We are running a commercial site. We want bind to execute some additional actions before the response, listed as below: 1) Client querys for www.site.com's ARR. 2) Bind gets client's IP, and calculate something based on this IP. 3) If IP matchs condition A, return the ARR of www.site.com

Re: how to archieve this?

refer to 'split' DNS using views here's something: http://www.zytrax.com/books/dns/ch7/view.html in a nutshell.. you have to - have 2 views, same zone per view - either have two different zone files... and maintain it separately. (or you may have two zone files and segregate the differences,

Re: how to archieve this?

Depending on the rules you intend to use, you may find that BIND simply isn't suited to this purpose. You may need to write your own name server implementation, using a set of F5 appliances, or something else. If you do this, you are probably best off handling as much as you can using BIND, and

Re: how to archieve this?

--- On Fri, 12/5/08, Chris Buxton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: An example that you may find useful as a starting point is lbnamed. It's old and probably has some bugs in its protocol handling, but it does something along the lines that you're looking for. Thanks for the info. I have

Re: how to archieve this?

--- On Fri, 12/5/08, ivan jr sy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: ivan jr sy [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: how to archieve this? To: bind-users [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Friday, December 5, 2008, 12:05 PM refer to 'split' DNS using views here's something:

Re: how to archieve this?

While I have no experience with the performance of lbnamed, I have heard that the resolving name servers used by OpenDNS run a name server program written in Perl. (I forget the name of the package.) Performance is a problem that can be overcome with optimizations and by throwing more hardware at

Re: how to archieve this?

Or, does Bind developer group provide commercial development for this purpose? We can pay for it. --- On Fri, 12/5/08, Chris Buxton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Chris Buxton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: how to archieve this? To: bind-users bind-users@lists.isc.org Date: Friday,

Re: how to archieve this?

If you have money to spend, just buy a commercial load-balancing solution. - Kevin Ken DBA wrote: Or, does Bind developer group provide commercial development for this purpose? We can pay for it. --- On Fri, 12/5/08, Chris Buxton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Chris Buxton [EMAIL